Skip to main content Skip to footer site map
S38 Ep2

Moynihan

Premiere: 3/29/2024 | 00:02:49 |

Discover the life and legacy of former U.S. Senator and diplomat Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Going beyond the “Moynihan Report,” President Joe Biden, Ta-Nehisi Coates and others reflect on his decades-long fight to end national poverty.

WATCH PREVIEW

WATCH PREVIEW(Extended AD + Open Captioning + ASL)

WATCH FULL EPISODE

About the Episode

Discover the life and legacy of U.S. Senator and diplomat Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

A bipartisan intellectual, he served under four presidents — both Democrat and Republican — and served four terms in the Senate. President Joe Biden, Senator Charles Schumer, Ta-Nehisi Coates and others reflect on his career, including the “Moynihan Report” and his efforts to combat national poverty.

Moynihan premiered March 29, 2024 on PBS (check local listings), pbs.org/americanmasters and the PBS App.

Accessible versions of the documentary are now available with on-screen ASL interpretation and extended audio description with large open captions.

American Masters shares the stories of political “Thought Leaders” with new documentaries on PBS.

As the U.S. enters a new election cycle, examine the lives and legacies of political changemakers.

Political discourse in the United States is shaped by audacious ideas of what a society should be. But who are the influencers and disrupters of American political thought that have paved the way for the systems that we currently have—and those still to come? Beginning in September 2023, American Masters seeks to answer this question with Thought Leaders, a collection of documentaries spotlighting key figures in American politics, law and music.

Films under the Thought Leaders banner include Jerry Brown: The Disrupter, Floyd Abrams: Speaking Freely, A Song for Cesar, Max Roach: The Drum Also Waltzes, Moynihan, The Incomparable Mr. Buckley and others to be announced. The documentaries will premiere on PBS (check local listings), pbs.org/americanmasters and the PBS App.

“’How did we get here?’ is a question we are all asking ourselves these days, and it is a complicated one,” said Michael Kantor, Executive Producer of American Masters. “By examining the origins and accomplishments of these thought leaders who share such different perspectives, American Masters aims to add crucial context and nuance to what we’re seeing in today’s political arena.”

SHARE
QUOTE
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
PRODUCTION CREDITS

Moynihan is a Production of Riverside Films LLC, in association with American Masters Pictures. Directed and produced by Joseph Dorman and Toby Perl Freilich. Written by Joseph Dorman. Narrated by Jeffrey Wright. Director of Photography is Roger Grange. Edited by Aaron Kuhn. Executive Producer is Andrew Karsch. Executive Producer for American Masters is Michael Kantor.

About American Masters
Now in its 38th season on PBS, American Masters illuminates the lives and creative journeys of those who have left an indelible impression on our cultural landscape—through compelling, unvarnished stories. Setting the standard for documentary film profiles, the series has earned widespread critical acclaim: 28 Emmy Awards—including 10 for Outstanding Non-Fiction Series and five for Outstanding Non-Fiction Special—two News & Documentary Emmys, 14 Peabodys, three Grammys, two Producers Guild Awards, an Oscar, and many other honors. To further explore the lives and works of more than 250 masters past and present, the American Masters website offers full episodes, film outtakes, filmmaker interviews, the podcast American Masters: Creative Spark, educational resources, digital original series and more. The series is a production of The WNET Group.

American Masters is available for streaming concurrent with broadcast on all station-branded PBS platforms, including PBS.org and the PBS App, available on iOS, Android, Roku streaming devices, Apple TV, Android TV, Amazon Fire TV, Samsung Smart TV, Chromecast and VIZIO. PBS station members can view many series, documentaries and specials via PBS Passport. For more information about PBS Passport, visit the PBS Passport FAQ website.

About The WNET Group
The WNET Group creates inspiring media content and meaningful experiences for diverse audiences nationwide. It is the community-supported home of New York’s THIRTEEN – America’s flagship PBS station – WLIW21, THIRTEEN PBSKids, WLIW World and Create; NJ PBS, New Jersey’s statewide public television network; Long Island’s only NPR station WLIW-FM; ALL ARTS, the arts and culture media provider; newsroom NJ Spotlight News; and FAST channel PBS Nature. Through these channels and streaming platforms, The WNET Group brings arts, culture, education, news, documentary, entertainment and DIY programming to more than five million viewers each month. The WNET Group’s award-winning productions include signature PBS series Nature, Great Performances, American Masters and Amanpour and Company and trusted local news programs MetroFocus and NJ Spotlight News with Briana Vannozzi. Inspiring curiosity and nurturing dreams, The WNET Group’s award-winning Kids’ Media and Education team produces the PBS KIDS series Cyberchase, interactive Mission US history games, and resources for families, teachers and caregivers. A leading nonprofit public media producer for more than 60 years, The WNET Group presents and distributes content that fosters lifelong learning, including multiplatform initiatives addressing poverty, jobs, economic opportunity, social justice, understanding and the environment. Through Passport, station members can stream new and archival programming anytime, anywhere. The WNET Group represents the best in public media. Join us.

UNDERWRITING

Original production funding for Moynihan provided by Ford Foundation/Just Films, David A. Jones through the Community Foundation of Louisville, Inc., Sage Publications, Inc, Alvin Dworman, Leon Levy Foundation, Daniel & Joanna S. Rose Fund, Inc., Thomas W. Smith Foundation, Hertog Foundation, Inc., Ambassador Donald & Mrs. Vera Blinken, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Christopher Finn, Greater New York Hospital Association, The Eranda Rothschild Foundation, George Klein, John & Margo Catsimatidis Foundation Inc., David Rockefeller, The Fullerton Family Charitable Fund through the Better Angels Society, Malkin Fund, Inc., M. A. Orth, Susan Henshaw Jones, Andrea Mitchell, James D. Wolfensohn, Burton P. and Judith B. Resnick Foundation, Bialkin Family Foundation, The Shelley & Donald Rubin Foundation, James Piereson through Donors Trust, Inc., Richard D. Parsons, Nancy Bernstein, Douglas Schoen, Mary M. Raiser, Frederick W. Beinecke, David W. Wolkowsky, Robert L. Lenzner, and Michael Schneider.

The Leon Levy Foundation provided funding for this program. Elizabeth Moynihan, now deceased, was a Trustee of the Foundation.

The Leon Levy Foundation had no editorial involvement in the creation of Moynihan.

Original Production funding for Moynihan and American Masters provided by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Original American Masters series funding provided by The Rosalind P. Walter Foundation, AARP, Sue and Edgar Wachenheim III, Koo and Patricia Yuen, Seton J. Melvin, Lillian Goldman Programming Endowment, The Blanche and Irving Laurie Foundation, Thea Petschek Iervolino Foundation, The Philip and Janice Levin Foundation, Vital Projects Fund, The Marc Haas Foundation, Judith and Burton Resnick, Ellen and James S. Marcus, The Ambrose Monell Foundation, The André and Elizabeth Kertész Foundation, Blanche and Hayward Cirker Charitable Lead Annuity Trust, Kate W. Cassidy Foundation, Anita and Jay Kaufman, and the Charina Endowment Fund.

Accessibility features made possible by support from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

COMBINED ACCESSIBLE TRANSCRIPT

Logo:

PBS.

Text on screen:

A film slate reads “American Masters.”

Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

Support for American Masters is provided by:
Corporation for Public Broadcasting;
Just Films Foundation;
The Better Angels Society;
Fullerton Family Charitable Fund;
and many others, including viewers like you. Thank you.

On screen:

Now, a polka-dot bowtie.

Commentator:

What is a senator? One percent of one half of one of the three branches of government.

On screen:

A pin-striped suit.

Commentator:

Unless, of course, you’re Mr. Moynihan.

On screen:

Moynihan raises his prominent brows.

Commentator:

His life was one of the broadest and deepest public careers in American history.

On screen:

He poses with fists on his hips.

Primary Narrator:

Politician, social philosopher, and statesman… Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s wide-ranging influence can still be felt today.

On screen:

Headlines:
Wild Irishman;
The Controversial Moynihan Report;
Good Work, Mr. Moynihan

Narrator 2:

I don’t think you get many people in public life who have this kind of unique insight, from highway safety to welfare…

Narrator 3:

Social and family policy…

Narrator 2:

The role of the United Nations…

Narrator 4:

Infrastructure…

Narrator 3:

Public architecture…

Narrator 5:

Or Social Security.

Narrator 6:

Secrecy in government…

Primary Narrator:

In the last half of the 20th century, Daniel Patrick Moynihan was at the center of America’s most urgent political debates.

Moynihan:

Equality and liberty are two different things.

Primary Narrator:

He served four consecutive presidents…

On screen:

With Nixon, then Ford.

Primary Narrator:

…and was elected to four terms in the Senate. It all began with his fight for America’s poor.

Moynihan:

Things are not getting better for everybody!

On screen:

The Atlantic: “Few figures loom larger in the American poverty debate.”

Moynihan:

There is a group of Americans for whom things get worse.

Commentator:

I certainly have memories of when the Moynihan Report exploded into controversy.

Primary Narrator:

He rose to national celebrity as America’s most famous representative to the United Nations.

Commentator:

One word that’s attached to you wherever you go until you’re probably sick to death of it is “flamboyant.” “The flamboyant Patrick Moynihan.”

Moynihan:

Am I embarrassed to speak for a less-than-perfect democracy? Not one bit. Find me a better one.

On screen:

In a portrait, Moynihan gazes somberly into the camera. The older and clean-shaven white man wears a button-down shirt with an open collar. White hair and thick dark brows mark his world-weary, yet warm, face.

Will:

He was a man shaped by the Depression. He saw government do an enormous amount of good.

On screen:

As a younger man, with dark hair…

Commentator:

He was always a liberal who knew that Liberalism thrived only when it could question itself.

On screen:

…and a doughy face.

Commentator:

Moynihan hated the notion that government is the problem. His own rejoinder to that was, “If you have contempt for government, you will get contemptible government.”

On screen:

At an event with Caroline Kennedy. Now giving testimony at a hearing.

Commentator:

There’s no doubt in my mind that if Pat Moynihan had been airdropped into New England in the 1770s, he would’ve been one of the most prominent members of our founding fathers.

Commentator:

The great challenges of our time have been challenges of ideas. Politics is an argument about the future.

[ Crowd cheering ]

[ Fanfare plays ]

On screen:

A title appears: Moynihan. A quote: “Progress begins on social problems when it becomes possible to measure them.” – Daniel Patrick Moynihan. 1960: JFK and Jackie Kennedy ride in a tickertape parade. American Historian Sam Tanenhaus:

Tanenhaus:

When the Kennedy administration swept into office, the New Frontier, and there’s this great excitement, the greatest since the New Deal. Brilliant people are leaving the Ivy League. They’re going to Washington.

On screen:

Political Commentator George Will:

Will:

1960 election brought Jack Kennedy to town. Was supposed to empower the American professoriate. It was academia’s moment.

Tanenhaus:

And the idea was technocratic problem-solving. And that was Moynihan’s specialty.

On screen:

Editor Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

Moynihan at the time was teaching social policy at Syracuse University. He had worked for New York Governor Averell Harriman and was yearning to get back into politics. When Kennedy came along, it was, I would imagine, love at first sight. Kennedy was an intellectual. He went to Harvard. He was a war hero. He was Irish.

On screen:

Moynihan is sworn in by Secretary of Labor Arthur Goldberg.

Commentator:

I went into the Labor Department as an assistant to that great man Arthur Goldberg.

On screen:

Biographer Godfrey Hodgson:’

Hodgson:

It’s not entirely plain what his role was except, I think, that Arthur Goldberg enjoyed having a clever young man tossing out ideas. He had this extraordinary ability, amounting almost to genius, for seeing the broader implications in what other people would regard as banal facts. For example, he got a rather casual interest in the rebuilding of Pennsylvania Avenue, and he extrapolated that into a brilliant piece of writing about what should be the principles of federal architecture, which is still used by the government of the United States to this day.

On screen:

A parade:

News Anchor:

Solemnity gives way to celebration as the traditional Inaugural Parade…

Patterson:

These were seen as wonderful times economically in the United States.

On screen:

Historian James Patterson:

News Anchor:

…birth of a new generation of Americans.

Patterson:

Poverty had not really been an issue since the 1930s.

Hodgson:

People forget that the great inaugural speech that Kennedy made, there was no mention of any domestic issues.

On screen:

Now a civil rights march led by Martin Luther King, Jr.

Commentator:

And then in ’63, things began to change.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

On screen:

Tear gas overtakes the crowd. Professor of Social Policy Ronald B. Mincy:

Mincy:

You had a Civil Rights Movement that would not rest, that was looking for equality for African-Americans now. And intertwined with the Civil Rights Movement was seeing that there was a poverty problem.

On screen:

In an NBC film, Poverty is People, four people share a bed.

News Anchor:

Michael Harrington. Author and expert on poverty.

Man on TV:

One of the most terrible things about poor people is that they are people who are literally without hope. And when you stick them off in a corner of the society, where most of the people don’t even know they exist anymore, they feel, rightly, that they’re left out, that nobody cares, that there’s no place for them.

Hodgson:

Kennedy certainly read “The Other America” by Michael Harrington. And the administration was moving towards seeing poverty as an important political issue in a very cautious way.

[ Applause ] When Lyndon Johnson came in, he’s, “We’re going to do this nationally and we’re going to do it big.”

On screen:

January 8, 1964:

LBJ:

And this administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.

[ Applause ]

Patterson:

Moynihan was one of the people — Moynihan, being an Assistant Secretary of Labor in early ’64, was one of the people who helped Johnson design what became known as the War on Poverty.

Patterson:

It was ultimately headed by Sargent Shriver.

On screen:

Moynihan’s wife, Elizabeth Moynihan:

Liz Moynihan:

[Chuckling] I remember… There was one week when they were really trying to draw up what it would be. And every — They all were working in other places and, at 5:00, would show up at our house.

[ Laughs ] And it was Adam Yarmolinsky — came from Defense Department. Frank Mankiewicz. Pat’s friend Mike Harrington, who’d written the book on poverty. And Pat. And the War on Poverty was planned over spaghetti dinners at the Moynihans’.

[ Laughs ]

On screen:

Air Force One in flight. The Poverty Tours, 1964.

Primary Narrator:

For the first time in our history, an America without hunger is a practical prospect.

Man on TV:

We’re only at the beginning of the road to the Great Society.

On screen:

Johnson meets with a father on a log cabin porch.

Man on TV:

I’ve been unemployed now since 1962.

On screen:

A man leans on a city lamp-post.

Man on TV:

I need a job.

Man on TV:

I’ve been out of work over four years. I’ll go down and try to get work and can’t get no work.

Man on TV 2:

I know that I’m just a Negro, but I’m a citizen. I know that, I… I was born in America, so that makes me a citizen, doesn’t it?

On screen:

Historian James Patterson:

Patterson:

Moynihan, as early as early 1964, is writing memoranda about the need to do something special for poor Black people, as opposed to all poor people.

Moynihan:

I felt that the great crises having to do with the protection of the liberties of Negro Americans in the South were probably coming to an end. It seemed to me that we would now turn to the problems of the Northern ghettos, the Northern slums, where just passing a law wasn’t going to change things, where problems were much more difficult.

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan’s interest in urban Black poverty was triggered, in part, by a study he had led a year earlier. Eager to boost its ranks during the Cold War, the military was concerned that too many men were failing their exams. What Moynihan found was that many of them came from single-parent homes, and a disproportionate number were impoverished Black men.

On screen:

Moynihan sits before a typewriter.

Patterson:

Moynihan sat down to write his report on the Black family, which was titled “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action,” on January 1st, or thereabouts, 1965… and, with the help of Paul Barton, a chief aide, finished it in the remarkably quick time of little more than three months.

Primary Narrator:

That report began, “The United States is facing a new crisis in race relations.”

On screen:

A title: The Negro Family: The case for National Action.
An excerpt: “Three centuries of sometimes unimaginable mistreatment have taken their toll…”

Man on TV:

Teenage unemployment in the Negro world today is almost 25%. That is a social crime! That’s an outrage!

On screen:

Sociologist William Julius Wilson:

Wilson:

He was one of the first scholars to integrate structural analysis, for example, the problems of urbanization, joblessness, Jim Crow segregation, and so on, and their effects on the Black population… and cultural analysis. That is, the way Blacks respond to chronic, racial, and economic subordination. And sometimes the response is problematic.

Patterson:

The very start of the second chapter says, “At the heart of the deterioration of the fabric of Negro society is the deterioration of the Negro family.”

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan immersed himself in a raft of statistics that convinced him impoverished Black families were under enormous stress, their children deeply affected. By 1960, nearly 24% of these families were headed by single parents. This was some 8 times greater than the rate for white families.

Moynihan:

How’d you learn how to behave? From your father and your mother and the people around you. Well, supposing there is no father, where children are just brought up without that support which a family gives it. Then what do you end up with? You end up with the cycle reproducing itself.

Liz Moynihan:

That report was intended for one person — president of the United States, Lyndon Baines Johnson.

On screen:

Editor Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

Moynihan writes a memo to President Johnson, appealing to him to understand. “You were born poor, yet you came of age full of ambition, energy, and ability because your mother and father gave it to you. The richest inheritance any child can have is a stable, loving, disciplined family life.” And he’s trying to get Johnson to understand this culture of poverty and racism that was assaulting the poor Negro family.

On screen:

An excerpt: The consequences of the historic injustices done to Negro Americans are silent and hidden from view.

Wilson:

The insight that he had was that we have to go beyond civil-rights legislation to address the cumulative effects of chronic, racial, and economic subordination. And what he was saying was that we need to move beyond issues of liberty and address issues of equality.

[ Applause ]

On screen:

An excerpt: Lincoln freed the slaves, but they were given liberty, not equality. It was therefore possible to deprive their descendants of much of their liberty as well. The principal challenge of the next phase of the Negro revolution is to make certain that equality of results now follow.

Weisman:

And Johnson incorporates that thought into one of the most important addresses any president has ever given.

[ Applause ]

On screen:

Howard University, June 1965:

LBJ:

But freedom is not enough. You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race, and then say, “You are free to compete with all the others,” and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.

Will:

This is the core of the liberal anthem that LBJ stood for.

[ Applause ]

On screen:

William Julius Wilson:

Wilson:

I remember listening very carefully to President Johnson’s speech at Howard University in 1965. And I said, you know, “This… This resonates with me.”

[ Applause ]

On screen:

The Howard audience gives a standing ovation.

Wilson:

And it was based on the Moynihan Report. So it’s unfortunate that it turned out to be so controversial down the road.
On screen:

Cut to black. On the Dick Cavett Show, Moynihan smiles graciously during his introduction.

Dick Cavett:

Daniel Patrick Moynihan has been a public figure for so long as a writer and an advisor to Presidents and ambassador to the U.N. Senator Moynihan, if I could get just a touch of personal color, I always thought, as far back as I first saw your picture, that you were what they call I believe “to the manner born.” I would have thought of you silver spoon in the mouth, so on, finest schools, yachting as a boy, and so on. And I was startled when I learned that you had quite a different background. You grew up in Hell’s Kitchen, in Harlem. You went to City College. You’ve been a stevedore. You’ve ridden the rails, I believe, and you had..

Liz Moynihan:

Well, it was a single-parent family. Three kids. He was the oldest.

Barone:

His father abandoned the family.

On screen:

Political Analyst Michael Barone:

Barone:

He was growing up in the 1930s when most families were intact, when divorce or desertion was uncommon.

Eaton:

As he once said to me, it’s not as though he walked out the door one day…

On screen:

Moynihan’s Chief of Staff, Richard Eaton:

Barone:

…to get a pack of cigarettes and never came back. He left over time. So it took a year or two until it was clear he was never going to come back.

On screen:

Moynihan’s wife, Elizabeth Moynihan:

Liz Moynihan:

Pat was poor, but it was because his family was divorced and his father lost his job. It wasn’t because — And drank. His parents drank.

On screen:

In a portrait, a mother and three young children.

Liz Moynihan:

It wasn’t because they’d never made it out of that immigrant status.

On screen:

Godfrey Hodgson:

Hodgson:

If you do start in a middle-class family and lose that, in this case because of marital breakdown, it’s probably more scary than, for example, if your parents are hard-rock miners and don’t know anything but that.

On screen:

Childhood Friend Harry Hall:

Hall:

His mother was a nurse, and she was having a hard time financially, and she married a new man, and it produced a new baby. And so they moved from the city, somewhere in the city, to Kitchawan.

On screen:

Westchester, New York.

Hall:

Pat was definitely a city boy, interested in things citified. He read the newspapers, and kids in eighth grade there didn’t read the newspapers. He spoke about things that I didn’t know about and didn’t give a damn about — John L. Lewis and Walter Reuther and the coal miners and the auto workers. When you saw him in class, he’d sit in one of these little wooden chairs, and his arms would flail out, his legs would spread out, and he looked like Ichabod Crane. He was…different.

On screen:

Two brothers pose atop a rock.

Liz Moynihan:

I don’t know why these two brothers were so different in their response to the father leaving. Michael all his life talked about missing a father, not having had a father. But Pat didn’t. And, in fact, Michael would occasionally say to Pat, “You know, you’re — you’re not the father I need.”

On screen:

As a young man, he poses with family.

Primary Narrator:

After two years, Moynihan’s mother was a single parent once again and moved the family back to New York City.

On screen:

The Triboro Bridge leads to Queens.

Hall:

It was a little grungy apartment in Astoria.

On screen:

A block of four-story tenements.

Hall:

I do know that it seemed to be a wretched family situation.

Hodgson:

He was always afraid of poverty for himself. Certainly his friends thought, in later years, that he worried too much about losing jobs. Underneath his tremendous charm, energy, ebullience, there was also a little grain of fear, I think. Not physical fear. He was not a coward. I don’t mean that. He was just afraid of the abyss.

On screen:

Daughter Maura Moynihan shows a portrait:

Maura Moynihan:

This is Dad and President Johnson, who nev– Ken Galbraith told me that Johnson didn’t like or trust Moynihan ’cause he was a Northeast liberal, a Kennedy man.

Moynihan:

Time was getting at hand to get out of Washington, so I decided to take a two-dollar bet and run for president of the city council.

On screen:

A poster: Screvane, Lehman, and Moynihan.

Song:

♪ He’s our man, hallelujah ♪

Liz Moynihan:

Kennedy appointees had a difficult time leaving the Johnson administration. Song:

♪ Moynihan, hallelujah ♪

Liz Moynihan:

But if you left to run for office, it was okay. When the primary was over and we had lost, I explained to my children that we were celebrating because the only thing worse than losing would have been winning.

[ Laughs ]

On screen:

A headline: Screvane to pick two newcomers.

Primary Narrator:

On July 19, 1965, The New York Times announced what would be Moynihan’s unsuccessful candidacy for City Council. That same day, a second article reported an anonymous internal government study on the state of the Negro family.

On screen:

James Patterson:

Patterson:

The report leaked in the summer of 1965. The timing is very important here because what happens also in the summer of 1965 is the awful Watts riot.

On screen:

Buildings burn. Police push back protesters and fire weapons.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

[ Sirens wailing ] TV

Primary Narrator:

Absolutely incredible scene, with gun battle in the middle of Broadway…

[ Gunshots ] 34 persons were killed, all but 5 of them Negros, in the middle of the nation’s third-largest city.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

On screen:

A body in the street; a black man covered in blood; another slumped lifelessly in a car.

Wilson:

And people were trying to come up with an explanation of, “Why did they riot?” -As the smoke lifted above Watts and the shooting died down, the soul searching and blame shifting began.

On screen:

An article covers The Moynihan Report.

Patterson:

Various columns appeared, including one by Evans and Novak, who were famous columnists in those days.

On screen:

August 1965.

Patterson:

That was titled “The Moynihan Report.” And that’s probably the first time that it really became known that way.

On screen:

An excerpt: Broken homes central to Negro problems.

Wilson:

And then people started associating the Watts riot with the Black family. “This is a cause of the Watts riot. The deterioration of the family has helped to trigger these riots.”

On screen:

Journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates:

Coates:

If you’re, say, in the activist community and you’re an African-American, well, the first lens that you have on the Moynihan Report is from Mary McGrory or, you know, it’s from Evans and Novak. That’s the lens through which you read this report.

On screen:

James Farmer writes: I now learn that we’ve caught matriarchy, and the tangle of Negro pathology.  We are sick unto death of being analyzed, mesmerized, bought, sold, and slobbered over, while the same evils that are the ingredients of our oppression go unattended. Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton:

Norton:

It came from a white intellectual, at what could not have been conceived as anything but poor timing because it overrode what certainly the African-American leadership and community believed needed to be exercised. “Alright, government, for 150 years, you’ve done nothing! No legislation against job discrimination. No legislation giving people the right to vote. The poll tax still out there. if you were a white man in Mississippi, you could go to work in a laboring job and become middle-class. If you were a Black man that had the same non-skills, you couldn’t get a job at all. What are you going to do about that? You talking about my family?!” If anything, the Black family, along with the Black Church, is all that kept the Black community whole.

Len Brooks:

This is Len Brooks inviting you to…Meet the Press. Our guest today is the author of the controversial study “The Negro Family,” Mr. Daniel P. Moynihan.

Liz Moynihan:

Pat was blindsided by the reaction of the left to what he was saying.

TV Interviewer:

What’s your explanation for the fact that it’s being criticized for fostering a new racism?

Moynihan:

I think there may have been a misunderstanding. I was trying to show that unemployment statistics, which are so dull, and you’ve read so many of them, and you don’t know what they mean, they’re hard to believe — That unemployment nonetheless ended up with orphaned children, with abandoned mothers, with men living furtive lives without even an address. That unemployment had flesh and blood and it could bleed.

Coates:

One of the reasons why the Moynihan Report ended up blowing up in Moynihan’s face is the document was never meant for public perusal. It is written in a very bombastic way. It was written to get the attention of politicians.

Norton:

Unless you took the time — and who does — to look into what Moynihan himself said were the causes, you would have taken up this view that these people just have to get their families together, and everything will be fine.

On screen:

From the report: Negro children without fathers flounder and fail.

Norton:

And that was what many in the Black community believed they had to rebut.

Man on TV:

They intend to build within Black people the realization…

On screen:

Stokley Carmichael:

Man on TV:

…that that problem is not theirs, that it’s created by White society. It’s purposely created by White society, and then they throw it back on us and blame us.

Wilson:

And a book came out by William Ryan called “Blaming the Victim.” TV

Primary Narrator:

…by William Ryan, a Harvard psychologist, who criticizes your report. “The implicit point is that Negroes tolerate promiscuity, illegitimacy, and everything else that is supposed to follow.” Now, how do you answer those charges?

Moynihan:

I’m not responsible for the fact that he can’t read. The point about the family is that it’s a good place to see the results of unemployment, the results of discrimination, the results of bad housing and poor education. And you can’t do anything about a family life if men don’t have jobs, if school children don’t have good schools, if people live in ghettos.

Patterson:

There’s a very ironical development in all of this, you know, because…

On screen:

Sociologist Orlando Patterson:

Patterson:

…um, up until the Moynihan Report, almost all writings on the problems that Black Americans face emphasize not just racism, but the fact that the years of oppression, of slavery, of Jim Crow had distorted aspects of Black life.

Moynihan:

Remember just one thing if I may say — that my report basically simply develops the work of the great American sociologist E. Franklin Frazier, whose book on the Negro family, published in 1939, in an uncanny way, predicted that this would happen.

Rustin:

The racial confrontation in America…

Wilson:

Kenneth Clark, Bayard Rustin, a lot of Black leaders endorsed the report and felt that Moynihan was unjustly criticized.

Liz Moynihan:

Martin Luther King called him. And Pat never used to take — He never answered the phone. I answered the phone. So I actually would often listen. And Martin Luther King was calling him about the report and said that Pat had analyzed it very well and there’s much in it that he agreed with. And he said, “I hope you understand why I can’t publicly support you.” Because he himself was under attack from the young Black radicals.

Patterson:

Johnson became very angry with Moynihan once the report became known. Here’s a president who’d done more for civil rights than any other president. Various Black leaders said it then, with two civil-rights acts, and they’re dumping on his administration through Moynihan.

On screen:

A news article: A White House spokesman wished to announce that there is no such person as Daniel P. Moynihan.

Patterson:

And Moynihan really started feeling very sorry for himself.

Norton:

I do think that he was hurt personally by the way in which the Moynihan Report was received.

On screen:

A black and white photo of Moynihan with a faraway gaze cuts to black. Richard Eaton:

Eaton:

My wife and I bought an apartment on the West Side of Manhattan, and we were very proud of it, and we invited the Moynihans for dinner. And as they were coming in the door Senator Moynihan said to Liz, “I broke into this building once.” And Liz was — Liz was as surprised as could be because he never talked about that part of his life. He said, “During the Depression, these buildings along West End Avenue were boarded up. And so after school, I would get enough money to eat and then break into one or another of these buildings to sleep and then get up the next day and go to school.”

On screen:

A somber young Moynihan is identified as President, Arista and Editor, Almanac.

Hess:

He didn’t talk very much about his youth. In fact, he didn’t talk at all about his youth.

On screen:

Chief of Staff Stephen Hess:

Hess:

He had to say some things because soon he was a politician and he was asked things. And he had a few set lines about, um — about shining shoes on 42nd Street…

On screen:

David Letterman:

TV Host:

You shined shoes just down the street a ways, huh?

Moynihan:

Used to shine shoes at 42nd. I was raised on — Not “raised” because in those days — No one can remember this in Manhattan, with rent control, anymore. In those days, everybody moved on the first of October, because you got one month’s rent free.

Weisman:

Although he had this erudite, almost patrician persona, he loved his working-class identity.

Moynihan:

I graduated then went straight to work on the piers, on the North River piers.

On screen:

Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

I mean, that was authentic about him, but there was a little bit of the “I grew up in a log cabin” kind of thing that a lot of politicians do.

Moynihan:

A friend of mine just showed up over at Pier 48 at the end of the day, and he said, “You know, they’re giving exams for City College. Why don’t we go up and take them? I’m going to go up. Do you want to come with me?”

Primary Narrator:

City College in New York was free and explicitly designed for poor, bright students like Pat Moynihan. He studied in the evenings and continued to work on the docks during the day to support himself.

On screen:

Childhood friend Harry Hall:

Hall:

He was a big fan of Thomas Wolfe. “Look Homeward, Angel.” And he said that the foreman on the docks told him, “Okay, guys, take five. We got to switch the cars.” So he took his copy of Wolfe, crawled up on top of the railcar, started reading, and promptly fell asleep. And he said he was rudely awakened by the stevedore from a “benign slumber.” One of his favorite words was “benign.” And he was fired.

[ Laughs ]

On screen:

A navy recruiting poster: Arise Americans!

Primary Narrator:

As World War II was drawing to a close, the 17-year-old Moynihan volunteered for the navy. Testing into an officer’s training program, he was sent to Middlebury College in Vermont and then, with the war’s end, to Tufts University, where he eventually earned a doctorate. For Moynihan, it was an entrée into a new world.

On screen:

Navy and College Friend Richard Meryman:

Meryman:

I think one of the things that — that he liked about me was that I was — had the sort of life that he wished he’d had.

On screen:

Horses pull a sleigh of young people.

Meryman:

You know, I had a secure, loving family. I was a totally separate relationship to this home life that he — I don’t know whether he was embarrassed or ashamed. He — He… But he… It’s not something he talked about.

On screen:

The young and tall Moynihan poses in uniform.

Meryman:

But at that part of our life, we were ready for anything. If a door opened, we walked through it. The Navy was a way to get a free education. Those were doors that opened. And I think the open doors for Pat were intellectual, ideas.

On screen:

In uniform, he lounges on a ship deck, smoking a pipe.

Hall:

At one point, when Pat was in his second year at the Fletcher School of International Law and Diplomacy at Tufts, at his mother’s bar, somehow — somebody got stabbed, and the bar was deserted. So Pat left Fletcher for two months, went down to the bar, ran the bar, and then returned to Fletcher and graduated valedictorian. Extraordinary ability.

On screen:

Sporting a mustache, Moynihan stands behind the bar.

Meryman:

His mother lived above the bar, and I remember one time that we spent the night on the floor. And she said to me something like, “I’m so sorry that a boy like you is a friend of Pat’s”…

On screen:

Wearing a suit, he smokes at the bar.

Meryman:

…the point being that he was bad news. She was sorry for me, that I had gotten involved with Pat.

On screen:

Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

If you read his diaries in the early 1950s, he was going through psychotherapy at the time, so the diary reveals his deeply emotional, mixed feelings about his father, whom he actually loved and had wonderful memories and tender memories of. And yet, because the father abandoned the family, he seemed to have felt obligated to hate his father.

On screen:

The children pose with the elder Moynihan.

Hodgson:

The boys were brought up that their father was a very bad man who had fallen apart. Actually, when Pat’s brother Mike went out to find him in California, they found a guy who was the editor of the Sunday edition of a major newspaper who had married again, with several children.

On screen:

Elizabeth Moynihan:

Liz Moynihan:

But Pat, you know, never… Didn’t attempt to be in touch with him.

Weisman:

You know, Liz Moynihan was also abandoned by her father. If you read Russell Baker’s memoir, there were men who just, as he put it, “disappeared into the Depression.”

On screen:

A man looks back from a crowded train platform.

Moynihan:

But a government cared about the high school I went to, cared about a free college, the first in history, the City College of New York. Went to universities, colleges, great places. Four advanced degrees. I never saw a tuition bill in my life. And something I realize — how different that experience is from those of most young people today. I’m a generation which I don’t think will be reproduced now for a while, which is deeply respectful of American government and owes — owes so much to it.

On screen:

Sam Tanenhaus:

Tanenhaus:

One reason Moynihan is so interesting is because he inhabited two worlds at once. He inhabited the world of practical politics. He also inhabited the world of the liberal intellectual. And in his day, the people who wrote for small magazines, for little journals, which had an influence we almost can’t imagine today — a publication like Commentary or The Public Interest, which Moynihan really helped create — had tremendous intellectual cachet. That’s where the ideas would begin and then reverberate through the society.

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan’s public writing, like his government work, often used data to reframe issues in novel ways. His article for The Reporter magazine in 1959, “Epidemic on the Highways,” was a classic example. It drew on epidemiological studies to show that traffic fatalities were not the result of human error but poor car design.

On screen:

Sociologist Nathan Glazer:

Glazer:

A lot of people read it and were very impressed, and it was almost, like, the beginning of the effort to raise levels of safety in automobiles in the United States.

On screen:

Commentary Editor Norman Podhoretz:

Podhoretz:

I first met Pat in 1961 when I called him up and told him I’d like him to write for Commentary, and he said he’d be delighted.

Glazer:

At that time, I’d become involved in a project on ethnic groups of New York City. I wanted to find someone who both had some intellectual sophistication, but also had direct experience and involvement. Irving Kristol, who was editing The Reporter magazine, said, “You should talk to Pat Moynihan,” and so we met.

Podhoretz:

Irresistible. And he always was. The charm. The wit. Always a lot of fun.

On screen:

On a city sidewalk, Moynihan laughs.

Glazer:

We’d have these long walks in New York, and we’d —

[ Laughs ] observe the buildings and sometimes step into a bar and so on. And he always drank much more than I did, but it didn’t seem to affect him in any way. And eventually Pat wrote a wonderful essay on the Irish in New York and America.

Primary Narrator:

When it was published in 1963, Glazer and Moynihan’s book, “Beyond the Melting Pot,” transformed how ethnicity was viewed.

On screen:

Chapters include: The Jews, The Irish, The Puerto Ricans, and more.

Primary Narrator:

It challenged the notion of an homogenized America and instead presented a country of jostling ethnic groups.

Moynihan:

There had been this idea that we’d all come over here, we were all different. We’d go into a melting pot, which is…

TV Personality:

Israel Zangwill.

Moynihan:

Israel Zangwill.

TV Personality:

The play. “The Melting Pot.”

Moynihan:

Right! But that was our creed and our hope.

On screen:

Vendors crowd a sidewalk.

Moynihan:

What we looked at was a city in which that hadn’t happened at all.

On screen:

Asian girls stand together.

Moynihan:

And if wasn’t going to be there in New York, it wasn’t going to be there anywhere.

On screen:

Black customers buy from a black vendor.

Weisman:

Pat Moynihan was very proud and really claimed, I think with some justification, that he was present at the creation of this whole idea of studying ethnicity as a serious academic subject.

On screen:

An Irish parade.

Moynihan:

I remember I was raised on 42nd Street and taught to think that all the people that lived on 43rd Street and 11th Avenue were somehow…animals and against us enlightened people who lived on 42nd Street and 11th Avenue. We’re a pretty mixed up population, always have been, and are always going to have some of the tensions that come with this. That’s one of the things that makes life interesting in the city.

On screen:

A woman peers into an Italian bookshop; A Black mother pushes a carriage; and crowds stroll on a beach. Fade to black.

[ Siren wailing ]

On screen:

  1. National Guardsmen roll down a street; firefighters battle flames; and authorities clash with Black men.

Primary Narrator:

1967 was the third summer of the burning and looting of the Black ghettos. This was Newark in July.

On screen:

Robert Kennedy:

JFK:

Mounting violence, lawlessness, and disorder that is taking place in our cities across the country has created the most serious domestic crisis since the end of the Civil War.

On screen:

In a news report, Cities have no limits, the reporter and Moynihan stand by burned out ruins.

News Reporter:

Two years ago, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, then Assistant Secretary of Labor, now director of the Joint Center for Urban Studies at Harvard and MIT, wrote a report that foreshadowed some of the events that have so shocked us these last summers. The report began, “The United States is approaching a new crisis in race relations.”

Moynihan:

Somehow the Negro world itself has been pulling apart. On the one hand, a working class, middle class…

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan, now out of government, used his new position at Harvard to analyze social policy and to focus public attention on the causes and problems of Black poverty.

On screen:

Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer:

Schumer:

I was a freshman at Harvard in ’67, and Pat Moynihan’s course was well-known because he was a brilliant man, but he had practical experience.

JFK:

I wonder if you’d give us what your ideas or thoughts are as to why we’re facing these kinds of problems.

TV Host:

Gunnar Myrdal described it a couple years ago. He said, “The United States is building up an underclass.”

On screen:

With Robert Kennedy:

Schumer:

He was a bridge between academic thought and government. And there were very few bridges that were as strong, as durable, and had as much a foot in each camp as he did.

On screen:

With students around a table.

Schumer:

The course was vintage Pat Moynihan. It led with policy.

Primary Narrator:

Policy like the War on Poverty.

On screen:

Johnson at a signing ceremony.

Primary Narrator:

By the time it was finally enacted, President Johnson had chosen to focus on education and empowerment rather than on jobs or money.

On screen:

People raise hands at a community convention.

Woman on TV:

This is a community beginning to act.

Weisman:

The irony of Pat Moynihan is that he’s pushing for equality of results and for poverty programs, but at the same time as these programs are being developed, he becomes very skeptical of them.

Woman on TV:

New York’s poor are demanding a voice in decisions that affect their lives.

Weisman:

To him, the War on Poverty was creating a costly bureaucracy to engage in social engineering instead of giving the money directly to the poor who needed it.

Moynihan:

…majority in the House Appropriations Committee, sir.

Patterson:

What Moynihan really wanted was a large-scale jobs program along the lines of the New Deal, the Works Progress Administration, the WPA. He was a big fan of Franklin Roosevelt.

On screen:

James Patterson:

Patterson:

Johnson didn’t want to do that. He didn’t want to spend a lot of money on jobs. Government jobs programs are expensive.

Moynihan:

I think the United States government can become the employer of last resort, so that, in effect, anyone seeking work, not finding it after a point, a job is found for him, period!

On screen:

Ronald B. Mincy:

Mincy:

Moynihan’s idea was to prepare people to work and put them to work so that they would have jobs with which they would be able to sustain their position in the family.

Glazer:

One of Pat’s great lines was, “We can do more for the Black family by doubling the delivery of mail than any other way.”

[ Laughs ]

On screen:

Nathan Glazer:

Glazer:

What he meant was, we could create 50,000 jobs for men if we just had two deliveries a day.

Moynihan:

…feel this country reaching a general consensus…

Coates:

The advocacy for unequal, preferential treatment.

On screen:

Ta-Nehisi Coates:

Coates:

The advocacy for a minimum level of income for the family. The advocacy for a big jobs program. The kind of solutions Moynihan advocated for are — I would say even in the time were radical and are very, very radical now.

On screen:

A Time magazine cover features a portrait of ‘Urbanologist Pat Moynihan.’

Weisman:

By the mid-’60s and certainly by the late ’60s, there was crushing disappointment.

On screen:

Chained black men file into a vehicle.

Weisman:

The riots in the cities. And there was the disappointments of the War on Poverty.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

On screen:

A protest sign: “Promises, promises, promises.”

Primary Narrator:

Johnson saw his hopes for a great society overwhelmed by the pain and anger in the country over the escalating war in Vietnam.

[ Indistinct chanting ]

On screen:

Young men burn draft cards. Elsewhere, troops arrive at a beach.

Patterson:

By 1965, we had 184,000 troops in Vietnam. And by the end of 1966, we had around 400,000.

On screen:

Sam Tanenhaus:

Tanenhaus:

And the cost of maintaining and perpetuating that war was overriding almost all other expenditures.

On screen:

A jungle village burns.

Tanenhaus:

It was very hard for Moynihan to accept that.

On screen:

A Black child blinks tired eyes.

Moynihan:

We have been saying we’re going to get rid of these problems. We have been saying we’re going to have full employment, we’re going to have good housing, we’re going to have equal opportunity. And it never happens.

[ Radio chatter ]

On screen:

A plane drops bombs over a jungle. In DC, a protestor carries a sign: “Beat LBJ into a plough-share.” In Oakland, violent protests.

People On TV:

Hey, hey, LBJ! How many kids did you kill today?!

TV Host:

We speak of the violence of poor Blacks. Now there is the violence of affluent Whites.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

On screen:

A protest at Columbia University.

Patterson:

So all of these things send liberalism crashing to the ground.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

On screen:

A sign: ‘Stop the war against Vietnam and Black America.’

Nixon:

My friends, let me make one thing clear.

On screen:

Richard Nixon:

Nixon:

This is a nation of laws. And as Abraham Lincoln has said, “No one is above the law, no one is below the law, and we’re going to enforce the law.” And Americans should remember that if we’re going to have law and order.

[ Cheers and applause ]

On screen:

A Nixon ad: “This time, vote like your whole world depended on it.”

TV Host:

I think there is a mood of people saying, “We’ve given you all we can. We’re not going to give you any more. We’re sick of it.” And talking about “law and order.” Alright. Law and order. We know that. But you can have law and order in a penal camp. You haven’t achieved much.

On screen:

In 2000, William Safire on Meet the Press:

Weisman:                  

I remember picking up and sending the Moynihan Report in to a candidate for president named Nixon, who was in the middle of his comeback. And he came back, interestingly enough, with, “This guy Moynihan.”

[ Laughter ] “You suppose we can get him to talk to us?” And I said, “He’s a Democrat, He’s a professor. Worked in the Kennedy administration.” And Nixon said, “Well, that’s three strikes, but maybe…”

[ Laughter ]

On screen:

1968: A family photo of Moynihan, Elizabeth, and three children.

Weisman:                  

And the word went out.

Liz Moynihan:

Someone came up from the president-elect’s transition office and said that the president would like to meet him. Would he come down? Nixon told him that he himself was an expert on foreign policy and that he knew what he wanted to do. He said, “One word. China.” But he did not know about domestic policy.

Nixon:

Ladies and gentlemen, I have another major announcement with regard to the White House staff.

Liz Moynihan:

When he came back and he told me that Nixon had asked him to be his Domestic Advisor and that he accepted, I was enraged, I have to tell you. I was just devastated, but furious.

[ Laughs ]

On screen:

Norman Podhoretz:

Podhoretz:

When he went into the Nixon administration, against the advice of his wife and friends — Nixon was the devil. Going to work for Nixon was a disgrace.

Moynihan:

Presidents don’t need advisors who agree with them about everything. They agree with you, then you’ve got one man on the payroll you don’t need.

On screen:

Stephen Hess:

Hess:

He had no stake in Nixon. He had a stake, as he felt it, in the presidency.

Liz Moynihan:

You can come home every weekend. You can commute. We’re not going to move.

TV Host:

His Urban Affairs advisor, Daniel Moynihan, told how the new administration hopes to attack urban problems.

On screen:

John R. Price:

Price:

As Moynihan said to me in my interview for the job with him, he said, “John, I want you to work with me on everything I’m doing.” And he said, “That is domestic policy. That is urban policy. And that is, therefore, policy about the Black community.”

Moynihan:

Now, having an urban policy is no more a guarantor of success with cities than having a foreign policy is a guarantor of success in, say, world peace. But it’s a condition of success. I mean, you have to start…

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan’s portfolio was the newly created Council on Urban Affairs. But its chairman was the president himself, making the council the powerful center for all domestic policy in the Nixon administration.

On screen:

Moynihan addresses a packed conference room.

Hess:

Pat was like a Roman candle going up. The sparks were in the sky all over the place. You’d go into a meeting with him, and you really wouldn’t know what was on his mind. He could be all over the line.

Price:

Pat was a ginger man in some ways. He was a yeasty, idea-creating person. For example, he brought in Bruno Bettelheim, who had written of children in the kibbutz in Israel and about the importance of early child development, and, forthwith, Nixon created the first office of Early Child Development in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. And whom did Pat put in charge of it? James Farmer, the head of Core.

On screen:

Senior Advisor Lawrence O’Donnell:

O’Donnell:

Pat Moynihan wrote probably the first memo about global warming in the American government, written in 1969. And that is part of how the Nixon presidency became so active on the environment.

Hess:

He would be in agriculture under food problems, hunger problems. He could be in the Department of Commerce under giving jobs to minorities. He loved the diversity of the job that he was given.

TV Host:

President Nixon has proposed a comprehensive anti-hunger package designed to make sure all Americans get enough to eat. His statement was read by Patrick Moynihan.

Moynihan:

The moment is at hand to put an end to hunger in America itself. It is a moment to act with vigor. It is a moment to be recalled with pride.

Hess:

We were in the basement of the West Wing. Right above us, on the first floor, was the president, the Oval Office. Then you went down one flight, and there was not only Pat Moynihan and his staff. There was also the Situation Room, Henry Kissinger and his staff. So you go down one flight, and you’re in the territory of these former Harvard professors.

On screen:

National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger:

Henry:

Well nobody expected Nixon to work closely with Pat. Nobody knew how Nixon would work with me, including myself because I hadn’t met him before he appointed me.

Podhoretz:

They were in a kind of implicit competition. Kissinger thought he had the more important position as National Security Advisor. At the beginning, certainly, the role that Pat was playing as Chief Domestic Advisor had the spotlight. And I don’t think Henry was very happy about that.

Henry:

Nixon certainly liked the effervescence of Pat. But that would not keep him, however, in conversations with the… conservative groups from expressing a certain disdain for intellectuals like Pat and me. But if you look at the actual performance, I would say that he was, by conviction, moving in the direction that Pat charted for him.

On screen:

Moynihan chief of staff Stephen Hess:

Hess:

It’s an interesting thing with Richard Nixon. He had these sort of love affairs with a person, where suddenly there’s some person who is special — “Some person who has something useful and helpful to me.” And it happened with Pat Moynihan at exactly the right time — like, Easter 1969. When everything was coming together, the one that Richard Nixon wanted to have around him, quietly, alone, was Pat Moynihan.

On screen:

Nixon special assistant John R. Price:

Price:

It’s a very interesting question about the relationship with the president on substance. Because it is a combination of Pat being a very adept courtier, on the one hand, frankly, which he did with color and verve and anecdotes and historical records, but, on the other hand, really trying to get the president to think large and to see himself in a very big historical context. The Blake biography of Benjamin Disraeli, which Pat drew to the president’s attention, was a case in point. I mean, Pat was trying to show how Disraeli, as a conservative, had taken the Tory party and moved it into deep concern for the poor and the lower middle classes and to show, by implication at least, that Nixon could do just the same thing for the Republican party.

Primary Narrator:

His eyes still on the impoverished Black family, Moynihan seized on the issue of welfare.

[ Telephone rings ]

On screen:

Clients visit a neighborhood service center.

Primary Narrator:

Its rolls had doubled in the ’60s and become the object of Republican scorn. Major reform of the program, he believed, was an idea that might capture Richard Nixon’s imagination.

On screen:

In DC, Moynihan and Nixon walk shoulder to shoulder.

Price:

Whatever else you think about Nixon, he came from a hardscrabble background, as did Pat Moynihan. And they found common cause. There was an instinctual level. It was like Moynihan would hit a tuning fork with Richard Nixon talking about some of these issues of poverty and difficulty of making your way.

On screen:

Young Nixon in a football jersey.

Hess:

Nixon wrote about what it had been like as a boy — poor boy, but not as poor — his father had a little store in Whittier, California — as the other kids who came into the store whose parents were on welfare, who he felt were scarred for life. He wasn’t scarred for life because he had parents who were an intact family.

Moynihan:

The problem of welfare is the problem of dependency. It is different from poverty. Poverty is a condition which, historically and into our time, is never enviable but is often associated with very fine personal qualities. Dependent persons which are — who are brave, who are resourceful, who are courageous — are nonetheless never envied. The buried image of the word “dependent.” People who are poor stand on their own feet. People who are dependent hang.

On screen:

Long lines form.

Primary Narrator:

Welfare, known as Aid to Families with Dependent Children, or AFDC, had been designed to help widows with children during the Depression. Over time, it had evolved into a national poverty program but remained targeted at single mothers.

Price:

You know, if there’s a male in the house, the women and the kids don’t get a penny, you know, if the male’s not working. That was the way AFDC worked. So Pat and Nixon wanted to fix it.

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan proposed to Nixon a program that would completely remake American social policy towards the poor. The Family Assistance Plan, in Moynihan’s eyes, would remove the stigma of welfare by giving support to all struggling families in America, whether the parents were working or not.

[ Fanfare plays ]

On screen:

An ad: ‘Applications for Old Age Security.’

Eaton:

The reason that Senator Moynihan liked it was because Social Security had worked so well.

TV Host:

The new government plan for old-age security.

Eaton:

And the way Social Security works is the government sends people a check. It doesn’t send people an administrator to tell them how to run their home. It doesn’t interfere in their lives in any way. People weren’t telling you what to do or how to spend the money, but they were — He thought that the difference between the rich and poor was that the rich had money and the poor didn’t.

On screen:

Richard Eaton:

Moynihan:

You know, Bill, what we’re trying to do here is more important I think perhaps than just the substance of the program. We’re trying to bring government back a little closer to what it is it can be said it knows how to do.

Bill:

Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.

Moynihan:

One of the great, heartbreaking experiences of the 1960s was to see government try to do so many things, and good things, only somehow to fail because, in fact, no one knows how to do those things. That old 19th-century saying that it’s not ignorance that hurts so much as knowing all those things that ain’t so.”

On screen:

Moynihan and Nixon in the oval office.

Hess:

Getting the president to support what was basically a negative income tax, which he campaigned against. What a turnover, to go before the American people and say, “Welfare has failed. And, by the way, I’m proposing something that’s going to cost more money!”

On screen:

August 1969:

Nixon:

That is why tonight I therefore propose that we abolish the present welfare system and that we adopt in its place a new Family Assistance system. What I am proposing is that the federal government build a foundation under the income of every American family with dependent children that can not care for itself.

TV Host:

Our guest today on “Meet the Press” is the assistant to the president for urban affairs, Daniel P. Moynihan.

Oberdorfer:

Why is it necessary to get so many more people onto the public assistance rolls in order to move people off?

Moynihan:

Mr. Oberdorfer, it is necessary to provide them Family Assistance payments because they are poor, because they do not now have the income that is needed to maintain a decent standard of life. The president’s proposal will triple the number of children receiving assistance. But this is not welfare. Most of those children will be in families with fathers who get up in the morning and go off and work a long, hard day and a long, hard week and it just doesn’t bring back enough money.

Hess:

The response to the Family Assistance Program is quite remarkable. Michael Harrington, a leading socialist writer on urban affairs in the United States, calls it the most radical program since the New Deal.

Moynihan:

John Gardner, the head of the Urban Coalition, said it was “an historic step.” It’ll abolish two-thirds of the poverty in this country in one step.

Price:

The White House staff realized it would be a hard slog in the Senate.

Hess:

There were certainly liberals, liberal Democrats mostly, who were unhappy because it seemed to be so little money.

TV Host:

Fannie Lou Hamer, founder of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party. HAMER: You’ve got to realize the sickness that’s happening in this country while the man is talking about giving a welfare family $1,600 — This is about as bad as it is in Mississippi.

Patterson:

Some of them used the acronym F.A.P. as meaning “…America’s Poor.”

TV Host:

California’s governor, Ronald Reagan, told the Senate Finance Committee he still opposes the administration’s proposal for a guaranteed yearly income.

Regan:

The president and I share completely the belief in the need for welfare reform and in the belief that something must be done to induce more people to work. I didn’t believe that the Family Assistance portion of that plan did this.

TV Host:

Chairman Russell Long and committee conservatives hope to kill the bill.

Hess:

The chairman of the finance committee, Russell Long, Democrat from Louisiana, certainly didn’t like a program that somehow was more advantageous to Blacks than to whites. In fact, more money went to whites just because there were more whites, but as a percentage, he was right.

Patterson:

So you had pressure from below for more, and you had pressure from above for less.

TV Host:

President Nixon reluctantly now is willing to compromise on his welfare reform plan. He is in fact now pleading for a compromise.

Moynihan:

My dear lady, it is five minutes to midnight. We have taken this great piece of legislation through the House. Now the president knows that if this bill is reported to the floor of the Senate, it will be overwhelmingly enacted. And to fail now would be to fail the nation and to fail the poor of the nation.

[ Down-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Moynihan sits with Nixon.

Price:

Nixon himself was still saying, “You know, don’t worry about the little stuff. You’re gonna get kicked in the shins all the time about this and that and the other thing.” He said, “The really important things are the big things, like Family Assistance, which we will get.” And he said, “Pat Moynihan will be able to hold his head up for the rest of his life.”

On screen:

October 1972:

TV Host:

Good evening. The Senate today shelved welfare reform for perhaps five to eight years. Instead, as anticipated, it voted to continue the present system.

Hess:

It failed in the Senate by one vote. Nixon could have gotten the vote from a Republican. Lyndon Johnson, if it were a comparable situation and he was going to the Senate, boy, he would’ve squeezed a senator till he got the vote.

TV Host:

There was agreement today that this is the end of the road for welfare reform and vigorous disagreement on who’s at fault.

On screen:

Men and women form long lines at a welfare office. In a photo, Moynihan’s teen daughter leans on his shoulder.

Price:

The Family Assistance Plan ultimately died in Congress. But Moynihan’s conservative rivals in the White House had been maneuvering to kill it almost from the beginning.

On screen:

March 1970:

TV Host:

As you may have noticed, there has been a small brouhaha lately over a secret memorandum to the president that suddenly appeared in all the public print.

TV Host:

Daniel Patrick Moynihan of the president’s White House staff sent Mr. Nixon a private memorandum on race relations, but somehow it became public.

TV Host:

The publication of that memo has caused a furor at the White House, as ABC’s…

Hess:

The memo was one of these beginning-of-the-year situations — “This is where we are. “This is where we should be this year.” The state of the African-Americans is really improving, but it has a long way to go. And it would be best if the rhetoric of race was quieted so that the flow was in the right direction. But he used the word — Pat always had a flair that could get him in trouble. And this time it really got him in trouble. He used the word…

Moynihan:

The time may have come when the issue of race could use a period of benign neglect.

Hess:

…which came out of some parliamentary document having to do with Canada. Where Pat got it, I don’t know. But it was there, and Pat got it.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

A headline: 21 Rights Leaders Rebut Moynihan.

TV Host:

A group of civil rights leaders charge that Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s suggested policy of “benign neglect” toward Negroes was symptomatic of Nixon administration efforts to wipe out two decades of civil rights gains.

Moynihan:

Had I made any suggestion of that kind, I would imagine I’d react about the way this group reacted. But I didn’t make any suggestion of the kind whatever.

Primary Narrator:

Concerned by increasing racial tensions in the country, Moynihan had written his memo in part to criticize the incendiary language of Black radicals that he believed was deepening the problem.

On screen:

  1. Rap Brown:

Brown:

…and you run into one of the cops, be he white honky or be he Black honky. Brother, they are out to kill you. America is practicing genocide against Black people.

Primary Narrator:

But he was equally frustrated with the Nixon administration’s stoking of racial animosity, its use of the so-called “Southern strategy” to appeal to whites who had fled the Democratic Party in the wake of Johnson’s civil rights legislation.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

A memo: “the relation of the administration to the black population is a problem.” Joel W. Motley:

Motley:

It was Pat really pushing against the malign attention that Blacks were getting from Nixon and Spiro Agnew and all the other Republicans who were developing and fomenting the Southern strategy, which was, at bottom, a racist strategy.

On screen:

Spiro Agnew, 1968:

Agnew:

Now, I threw down the gauntlet to you. I repudiate white racists. Do you repudiate Black racists? Are you willing to repudiate the Carmichaels and the Browns —

Woman on TV:

We have already done so.

Agnew:

Answer me. Answer me. Do you repudiate Rap Brown and Stokely Carmichael?

Woman:

We —

Agnew:

Do you?!

Woman:

We don’t repudiate them as human beings.

Woman:

We repudiate —

Agnew:

That’s what I was afraid of.

Woman:

Wait just a minute. I don’t repudiate you.

On screen:

Henry Kissinger:

Henry:

Agnew lived in a different world. It was the frustration of many that he was permitted to say the things he said. But for Nixon, I think this was primarily a political maneuver to placate the right. And I think Nixon sort of enjoyed him saying these things and rile up his opponents.

Price:

Pat’s enemies, if such there were, used that memo to discredit him and his liberal initiatives, most importantly, the Family Assistance Plan. Its passage was going to depend on the Northern liberal votes in the Senate and the House, and the leaking of the memo undermined Pat among liberal elements of the Democratic delegation. It hurt a lot.

Moynihan:

Howard K. Smith knows what I was saying. Dave Brinkley knows what I was saying. You know what I was saying. Right?

Morgan:

As you’ve been described as a leading —

Moynihan:

Look me in the eye, Ed Morgan. You know what I was saying.

Morgan:

Yes. My answer is yes.

Gill:

I am told by reliable sources that the net result will be politically damaging. Moynihan, known as the administration’s champion of equal opportunities, now expects to become the target of bitter protest by Negro groups. Bill Gill, ABC News, the White House.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

Ta-Nehisi Coates:

Coates:

I don’t find that memo to be problematic. I think what he wanted was a cooling down of the rhetoric. I think it became interpreted as “Do nothing for Black people.” I don’t think, you know, that was what he was necessarily advocating for from a policy perspective. I think much worse is some of the other memos…

On screen:

Excerpts: “The Negro poor having become more openly violent;” “They have given the black middle class an incomparable weapon with which to threaten white America.”

Coates:

where he asserts that the Black middle class is in fact using the Black poor to extort things from White America. That is incredibly dan– He’s playing with fire right there. You are running right down the middle of mainstream racism. That’s hard to reconcile except to look at his anger, except to look at his rage.

On screen:

Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

The Nixon presidency — It’s hard for people who didn’t live through it. It was such an emotionally charged, divisive period of history.

[ Crowd shouting ]

On screen:

A young man hurls a rock.

Primary Narrator:

Civil unrest and angry protests over the continuing war in Vietnam plagued Nixon’s presidency. And Moynihan, while a critic of the war, was deeply disturbed by the growing chaos and violence.

On screen:

Biographer Godfrey Hodgson:

Hodgson:

Pat was spending most of the time in Washington, and Liz and the children were on Francis Street in Cambridge.

TV Host:

On the Harvard campus, one day after students took over and occupied an administration building, the police were called in, swinging clubs, hauling students out of the building…

Hodgson:

A group of radicals at Harvard were calling for Pat’s house to be trashed on the grounds that he was a racist as witnessed the Moynihan Report.

TV Host:

After the police raid, SDS members and sympathizers…

Weisman:

The Secret Service had to get involved to protect their house. So it was a scary time, and he was furious about this.

[ Crowd cheering ]

On screen:

Sam Tanenhaus:

Tanenhaus:

It seemed to Moynihan that these were the children of the elite and the privileged and there was disrespect for the institution but also for — the phrase then used — Middle America. Hatred of the police, hatred of the military, of people who actually went and fought the wars. Moynihan was very distressed by that.

On screen:

Robert A Katzmann:

Katzmann:

I remember once walking with him through Harvard Yard, and he said, “We are in this place, but not of it.”

On screen:

In profile, Moynihan gazes somberly.

Hodgson:

He had a rather literal, almost kind of adolescent, way. There was a sense of honor. I can remember the Navy monument — It’s just next to their apartment in Washington. And he used, literally, to stand on a balcony going at attention, saluting when they played the Navy hymn, for example.

On screen:

Young Moynihan in an officer’s uniform.

Moynihan:

I am a fella whose first political memory was the 1936 election in New York City, the politics of Franklin Roosevelt, and the war against Germany. It was a time of intense and legitimate pride in your country and love of your country and so forth, and you can’t change me.

Tanenhaus:

To the radical left, people like Moynihan were about preserving and extending the status quo, keeping the lid on things rather than really making this a better country to live in.

On screen:

An article: ‘The Welfare State and Its Neoconservative Critics.’

Moynihan:

And at one point, the old traditional socialists suddenly started attacking us. In a celebrated article, it was decreed that people like Glazer and Moynihan and so forth were not liberals. We were neoconservatives.

On screen:

Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

Pat despised the term “neoconservative.” He thought it was a slur. Don’t ever use that term to describe him when you’re talking to Liz Moynihan.

Will:

He was considered a neocon. He wasn’t. He was a New Deal Democrat all the way through his life.

On screen:

Political Commentator George Will.

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan left his role as White House counselor in 1970.

[ Down-tempo march playing ]

On screen:

A pageant of horses escort a limousine.

Primary Narrator:

Two years later, a still-admiring Richard Nixon gave him a surprise appointment as ambassador to India.

On screen:

Moynihan arrives in the limo.

Primary Narrator:

The ambassadorship would help set a new course in Moynihan’s life — as diplomat and statesman.

[ “The Star-Spangled Banner” playing ]

On screen:

He holds his hat over his heart at a ceremony.

Weisman:

Moynihan helped repair relations with New Delhi by negotiating a major debt-relief package for India. And I think Moynihan got a kick out of the fact that the U.S. gave India the largest check ever written at the time. And India was a crucible for a lot of ideas that evolved for Pat Moynihan. He was sick and tired of the sort of ill-thought-out, Marxist-Leninist, anti-West, anti-U.S. intellectual elite in places like India and in other parts of what was then called the Third World. And he wrote this terrifically powerful essay that the U.S. had to stand up for itself in opposition.

On screen:

Norman Podhoretz:

Podhoretz:

What Pat said in that article was that official representatives of the United States had been apologizing for the country and had sat silently as the country was defamed and libeled by Third World tyrannies and despotisms. And he said this was crazy.

[ Applause ]

Henry:

When the U.N. position opened, I took that brilliant article in Commentary to President Ford.

On screen:

June 1975, Moynihan is sworn in as ambassador to the UN.

Man:

…do solemnly swear…

Moynihan:

…do solemnly swear…

Henry:

It was the period where the United States accused of an unnecessary war in Vietnam – seemed constantly on the defensive. And we thought that Pat would help us regain the diplomatic initiative.

TV Host:

Forty-two floors above Manhattan’s Park Avenue, the official residence of the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. The visitor is greeted by the only family servant, Hines, created in paper-maché by the 19-year-old-son of Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] Moynihan is a large leprechaun of a man with the mental equipment of a Harvard professor and with teeth behind his smile. And he says what he wants how he wants. In the United Nations today, there are in the range of two dozen democracies left in 142 members. Totalitarian communist regimes and assorted ancient and modern despotisms make up all the rest. It is sensed in the world that democracy is in trouble. There is blood in the water, and the sharks grow frenzied.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

Special Assistant Suzanne Garment:

Garment:

It was a time when not only had America lost its confidence in its actions abroad, but there was garbage piled in the New York City streets.

TV Host:

…garbage collectors refused to work again today…

TV Host:

More than 30,000 tons of garbage line…

Garment:

It was a time of real and profound loss of confidence.

TV Host:

“Ford to city: Drop dead.”

Moynihan:

If we are to be under attack continuously at the United Nations, as we are, if we are going to be attacked, we are going to defend ourselves and defend ourselves with some enthusiasm.

TV Host:

Idi Amin, the controversial president of Uganda, has been in the United States for the U.N. General Assembly.

TV Host:

He took aim at what he called “the bogus state of Israel.” He went on from there.

Garment:

Idi Amin was a kind of symbol of the obscenity of a tyrant speaking about international morality.

[ Camera shutters clicking ] And, as they say, that tore it.

TV Host:

Last week, our ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, used the term “racist murderer” to describe President Idi Amin of Uganda. Moynihan said it is no accident that Amin is the head of the Organization of African Unity, and that made a lot of Africans angry. Estimates of the number of Ugandans who’ve been killed…

Moynihan:

It seems to me that the function of public diplomacy and even of private diplomacy is to avoid misunderstanding, to make meaning clear.

TV Host:

Some of your critics say that perhaps you’re too public and that they suspect you of going more for impact than persuasion, more for drama than diplomacy.

Moynihan:

Well, they may be right.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Senator Henry ‘Scoop’ Jackson:

Jackson:

I’m here to compliment him and to pay my highest respects for the wonderful job in which he has represented our people in the U.N. By that I mean frustrated Americans that are a lot prouder today because of his presence.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

In a political cartoon, Moynihan slips a horseshoe into his boxing glove.

Podhoretz:

I would walk down the street with Pat. Taxi drivers would screech to a halt and yell, “You’re great!” You go into a restaurant with him, it happened. The whole place would stand up and applaud. We went to a concert once at Carnegie Hall, and the whole audience got up. I mean, things like that were happening all the time. It was kind of amazing.

On screen:

On the cover of Time Magazine with the headline “Giving them hell at the UN”

Podhoretz:

I mean, I’ve never seen anything quite like it.

TV Host:

Moynihan had been sharply criticized at the U.N., particularly by British delegate Ivor Richard…

Man:

The British ambassador spoke of a “Wyatt Earp approach,” with Moynihan’s aim occasionally bad.

Richard:

…from the pressures of civilized international…

Podhoretz:

The British ambassador, Ivor Richard, launched an attack on Pat, and Pat was convinced that Kissinger had put him up to it.

On screen:

Kissinger blinks in thought.

Henry:

Pat didn’t fit fully into any conventional category. He would sometimes get extremely offended when his convictions didn’t coincide with the feasibilities of the environment.

[ Indistinct conversations ]

On screen:

George Will:

Will:

Henry was a European, a great believer that politics between nations is a balance of power, period.

Henry:

Come a little closer, Kurt. Gonna ruin you.

Will:

Now, Kissinger knows that he had to accommodate a strain in America that Pat represented… …which was that the United States has a messianic gene in its DNA. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created –” Not all Am– every one. And the universalism of the Declaration of Independence is part of our national DNA, and a foreign policy that completely excludes that will not hold the American people.

Moynihan:

The most hideous thing I’ve ever had to deal with over at the U.N. was that resolution which called Zionism a form of racism.

TV Host:

It was Somalia?

Moynihan:

Somalia introduced it. Um, and — but Somalia as a Soviet client. The Russians began that campaign in 1971 — very open. When the Russians begin a propaganda campaign, there’s a three-part article in Pravda.

On screen:

“Zionists in dirty alliance with Nazis.”

Moynihan:

And it said Orwellian or horrible was that the Jews, far from being the victims of the Nazis, were the successors to them.

Henry:

One has to remember that any ambassador, no matter how able, operates within the framework of his mission. The Secretary of State and the President have to take into account the entire range of foreign policy. And while the Zionism resolution was going through the U.N., we were conducting negotiations in the Middle East, we were engaged in détente with the Soviet Union. So we had a broader range of foreign policy and we had to judge an individual resolution in relation to these other initiatives.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Suzanne Garment:

Garment:

Pat understood the importance of words. Every regime, like liberal democracy, depends not just on force but on principles that people accept as legitimating a regime. And by labeling Zionism as racism, you were saying that the homeland of the Jewish state was incompatible with liberal democracy. Whether a statement like that has an effect tomorrow, probably not. But does it have an effect over the long run, undermining people’s allegiances and their willingness to take action, their willingness to prevent bad actions? Yes. That’s exactly how it happens.

On screen:

At the UN:

Moynihan:

What we have at stake here is not merely the honor and the legitimacy of the state of Israel, although a challenge to the legitimacy of any member nation ought always to arose the vigilance of all members of the United Nations. For a yet more important matter is at issue, which is the integrity of that whole body of moral and legal precepts which we know as human rights.

Henry:

The professionals thought… and I would say I thought that the way to deal with it is to kill it through U.N. procedures. Which meant that you do not attack it frontally, you just let it get soaked up and gradually disposed of. He thought that this was a moral issue that he wanted to fight to a conclusion. It is sufficient for the moment only to note one foreboding fact — A great evil has been loosed upon the world. The abomination of antisemitism has been given the appearance of international sanction.

Will:

People didn’t talk like that. Kissinger didn’t talk like that. He said this is “wicked,” “infamous,” “evil.” About, you know, a few years later, the president of the United States was calling the Soviet Union “the evil empire.”

Moynihan:

…not forsaken them now…

Will:

So in that sense, Pat Moynihan was — it might have embarrassed him to acknowledge — a precursor of Ronald Reagan.

Moynihan:

The United States of America declares that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act. Thank you, Mr. President.

[ Applause ]

On screen:

A Reagan campaign speech:

Regan:

We need the Pat Moynihans of this world to remind us that our nation’s future need not be one of retreat and pessimism. I’m sorry —

[ Applause ] I’m sorry the administration was unable to keep him. His voice will be hard to replace.

TV Host:

Here is Ronald Reagan praising Daniel Moynihan, who may very well run for the Senate this fall from New York.

[ Indistinct conversations ]

Podhoretz:

I mean, Pat had politics in his blood. He’s been hanging around Democratic clubs since he was about 10.

TV Host:

Patrick Moynihan’s political career began in Hell’s Kitchen, where he cast his first vote, at age 21.

Moynihan:

I put on a suit, tie. I came in, and I walked down there.

On screen:

A church basement.

Moynihan:

Fella I’d never seen in my life said, “Hi, Pat!”

Reporter:

[ Laughs ]

Moynihan:

And I said, uh, “Well, sir, um, I’m not sure I’m eligible to vote.” “Everybody votes!” he said.

Reporter:

[ Laughs ]

Moynihan:

And as I went in the booth, he gave me a little piece of paper showing me who everybody was gonna vote for.

Reporter:

[ Laughs ]

Hill:

For all his reputation as a policy wonk, Moynihan loved the business of politics and winning elections. He had a lifelong respect for the old urban Democratic machines, like Tammany Hall.

On screen:

A top hatted mayor.

Hill:

Tammany was the epitome of corruption to critics, but to Pat, Tammany was successful because it actually delivered the goods to the poor.

On screen:

Thomas E. Mann:

Mann:

These were the only political organizations that welcomed new waves of immigrants and gave them the opportunity to get a job and start a family and build respectability.

Weisman:

One of the things I love is that when Pat was at Harvard, a letter was sent to Carmine De Sapio, who was then in federal prison for bribery and who had been the leader of Tammany Hall. And Pat said, “Well, I hope you’re doing well in prison, and when you get out, why don’t you stop by Harvard someday? I’m sure we would have a lot to learn from you.” So, uh, what a character.

[ Laughs ] That’s great.

Moynihan:

♪ Oh, goodbye, my Coney Island baby ♪

TV Reporter:

The distinguished gentleman singing “Coney Island Baby” is Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of five Democrats running for the Senate. He’s here at a beach club in Brooklyn because these Jewish voters can amount to 35% to 40% of the electorate in a Democratic primary. Sharing the frontrunning position with him is Congresswoman Bella Abzug. Mrs. Abzug has maintained her political base among feminists, liberals, and the New Left.

[ Up-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Moynihan sports a polka-dot bow tie.

Garment:

It was an extremely close campaign…

On screen:

Suzanne Garment:

Garment:

…because there were so many candidates, because the margins were so thin.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

A red-white-and-blue lapel pin says Moynihan.

Eaton:

The campaign, like all campaigns, was short of money.

On screen:

Richard Eaton:

Eaton:

So what they would do is they would drag Senator Moynihan to Ravitch’s office…

On screen:

Campaign Advisor Richard Ravitch:

Eaton:

…and call people.

Ravitch:

Pat and I used to meet occasionally in the Bemelmans Bar at the Carlyle but more frequently a few blocks to the north in a place called the Madison Pub. It was a dreadful bar.

Eaton:

Senator Moynihan, who liked the hamburgers at the Madison Pub, would go there and essentially hide because he knew that Ravitch himself found the place to be repulsive.

Ravitch:

There was a constant stale smell there, and I’m not sure why Pat liked it.

[ Music continues ] We walked out of the pub one day, and there was a guy on a bike. And he yelled out at Moynihan, “You right-wing bastard!”

TV Reporter:

Daniel Patrick Moynihan is no stranger to slings and arrows. He caught them as a member of the Johnson and Nixon administrations, and now, as a candidate for the Senate from New York, he still is a target. Yesterday, campaigning on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, he caught a banana cream pie in the face as the pie thrower, a proclaimed member of the Yippies, the Youth International group of protesters, shouted that Moynihan was a fascist pig.

Ravitch:

Well, I don’t think there was any Black politician that supported Moynihan in the primary.

On screen:

Mike McCurry speaks:

Mike McCurry:

There was Bayard Rustin who was for Moynihan.

On screen:

Bella Abzug:

Woman:

I’ve said Mr. Moynihan has to prove to the voters that he has renounced Nixon and Ford and their policies.

[ Indistinct conversations ]

On screen:

Moynihan shakes hands with voters.

Garment:

Because Pat was still suspect as a liberal, the conventional wisdom — and it was probably right in this case — was that the New York Times editorial would make a difference in the primary.

Ravitch:

People knew that John Oakes, the editor of the editorial page, didn’t like Moynihan, and we were terribly afraid that we wouldn’t get his endorsement.

Garment:

While the editor, John Oakes, was on vacation, the publisher had become convinced that the paper should endorse Pat. And John Oakes was reduced to writing a letter to the editor from Martha’s Vineyard opposing the Times editorial. It was a great moment in American journalism.

TV Reporter:

The United States’ recent colorful and controversial ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, has won the right to run as a Democrat for the United States Senate.

Eaton:

Senator Moynihan only won by 10,000 votes, or what he described at the time as a whopping…

Moynihan:

…a whopping 1%!

[ Laughter ]

Will:

When I first met Pat, he was running against a friend of mine, Jim Buckley. I was for Buckley and enchanted by Pat.

TV Reporter:

I welcome Professor Moynihan into the race. He called you a professor today.

Moynihan:

He did what?!

[ Laughter ] Well, it’s begun, has it? My God, it’s going to be a long, difficult time, I can see.

TV Reporter:

One of the liveliest of the Senate races is here in New York between incumbent Jim Buckley, running on the Republican and Conservative tickets, and Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

TV Reporter:

It is a classic confrontation between a conservative defender of local government control and a liberal advocate of national health insurance and federalization of welfare.

On screen:

Buckley:

Buckley:

He is shuttling back and forth from the faculty rooms at the Ivy League colleges and taking any job that any president has to offer him. Well, I believe we ought to send him back to Harvard, send him back to the classrooms, where the kinds of programs he advocates and where his academic attitudes can’t do harm.

Moynihan:

Jim Buckley?

TV Host:

Yep.

Moynihan:

He’s an engaging and… and…honest man who hasn’t the foggiest notion what the 20th century is all about. When New York has been Democratic, America has been great, and New York is Democratic again.

Gregory:

Of course, Moynihan doesn’t expect smooth sailing as he carries the case for New York into the Senate. And when reminded of his somewhat abrasive style in the U.N., Moynihan commented, “Well, at least it got their attention.” Bettina Gregory, ABC News, New York.

On screen:

At a bar, beer fills a pint glass as a group gathers and chats at the Annual Moynihan Senate Staff Reunion.

[ Indistinct conversations ]

On screen:

Mike McCurry speaks:

[ Glass clinking ]

McCurry:

Now, some of you may have been in the innermost inner sanctum in the Russell Senate Office Building, which was the senator’s private toilet in his office.

[ Laughter ] Not many people were allowed through there, and I just, one day, because he was gone and I was goofing around, I went in there. Now, on the wall, framed, there were two side-by-side magazine covers. One was The New Republic. “Moynihan, hope of the neoliberals.” And the other was ”

Moynihan:

…savior for the neoconservatives.”

[ Laughter ]

On screen:

On the cover of The Nation, a caricature of Moynihan wearing pistols and an ammo belt. A quote: Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. -Daniel Patrick Moynihan. President Joseph Biden:

Biden:

When he came into the Senate, there was a lot of skepticism about whether Pat Moynihan was a Democrat. I mean, he was obviously a Democrat, but was he a Democrat? Put another way, I think there is at least a half a dozen famous liberal Democrats who wouldn’t have been surprised had he run for the Senate as a Republican.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Moynihan meets with Ted Kennedy and others.

Eaton:

He was different from any other senator because he arrived every morning and immediately went into his office and began typing.

On screen:

In Harper’s, “State vs. Academe”

Eaton:

He was constantly writing an essay about something. And it could be about anything. It could be about architecture. It could be about Social Security. It could be his famous essay “Defining Deviancy Down.”

On screen:

In The American Scholar.

Will:

I once said rather mischievously that he while he was in the Senate, he wrote more books than many of his colleagues read.

On screen:

George Will:

Will:

He leavened the place with a sense of complexity.

On screen:

Chief of Staff Robert Peck:

Peck:

He knew the history of the United States Senate, and he thought that’s where, in American politics, you started to change ideas.

On screen:

Political Scholar Norman Ornstein:

Ornstein:

He wanted to spend plenty of time using his bully pulpit to raise big questions.

On screen:

Editor Steven R. Weisman:

Weisman:

He wasn’t everyone’s cup of tea. There was a feeling among some of Pat’s colleagues that he was a gadfly. One of Ted Kennedy’s top aides told me when I was working on the book, “You know, Pat Moynihan, I always thought he was more trouble than he was worth.”

Primary Narrator:

In his first term, Moynihan, the fierce opponent of the Soviet Union at the U.N., called for a re-examination of the Cold War and the newly escalating nuclear arms race.

Moynihan:

Where I think it was decreed that I was no longer a neoconservative took place about the time I came to the Senate. And it was on a pretty crucial issue, which was the issue of the Soviet Union.

Primary Narrator:

Moynihan based his changing opinion on a set of recently emerging data.

On screen:

Michael Barone:

Barone:

The death rate is one statistic that was hard for the communists to lie about. Moynihan, as a connoisseur of statistics, knew this. He followed the work of Murray Feshbach, the analyst who was documenting the increased death rate and the lower life expectancy in the Soviet Union, and he said, “Something pretty terrible is happening.”

Will:

Pat believed that conservatives stressing arms weren’t wrong but they were missing the point. The point was — and this is an essay Pat wrote — the problem was how to deal with an ailing bear.

On screen:

Norman Podhoretz:

Podhoretz:

I can tell you I got a call one day from Scoop Jackson himself. And he said, “Listen. Can’t you do something about your friend? He’s acting like a flake!”

On screen:

1981:

Moynihan:

Our problem between here and the year 2000, is how to deal with the breakup of the Soviet empire. It’s going to break up, Ben. It’s — It’s collapsing. They can’t feed themselves. That system is going to come apart.

On screen:

Germans hammer at the Berlin Wall.

TV Host:

This is NBC Nightly News.

TV Host:

Tonight, the end of an era. Mikhail Gorbachev’s farewell as the hammer and sickle is lowered over the Kremlin for the last time.

On screen:

A red-blue-and-white flag rises in its place.

Primary Narrator:

With the Soviet Union’s demise, Moynihan drew on his earlier work to predict the new and vastly different world fracturing along ethnic lines.

On screen:

Moynihan book titles: Beyond the Melting Pot, 1963; Ethnicity, 1975; and Pandemonium, 1993. Senator Bob Kerrey:

Kerrey:

What he saw with the book “Pandaemonium” was the Cold War is over, and the power balance between the West and the Soviet Union had disappeared.

[ Crowd cheering ]

On screen:

Demonstrators make V signs with their fingers.

Kerrey:

What you were gonna get as a consequence is people tend to organize themselves not as a part of the West or the East, but more oriented toward either a tribe or an ethnic group or a nation-state.

On screen:

A demonstration turns violent.

Moynihan:

The great source of violence in our age is conflict over religion, nationalism, language.

On screen:

People carried the injured.

Moynihan:

Wars that seem more to be associated with the Middle Ages than with the industrial period are upon us again.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Moynihan sits on a Senate Committee hearing. Senator Bill Bradley:

Bradley:

Senator Moynihan was viewed in the Senate with enormous respect, sometimes incomprehension, and sometimes a little fear. And the fear, of course, came from not wanting to go up against him in debate because he’d find something that you hadn’t thought of and you’d be in trouble.

On screen:

Senator Trent Lott:

Lott:

He was philosophically, obviously, very progressive. You know, he was from up there in New York, and sometime his intellect was further, you know, expanded by a little sip of scotch, perhaps. But I really admired Pat Moynihan, with his brilliant intellect and his somewhat sharp tongue. He was interested in the art of the possible.

On screen:

Senator Charles Schumer:

Schumer:

He was not an ideologue. He was an ideas person but not an ideologue. So he had great friends on the Republican side.

Lott:

I remember one of the things he came to talk to me about more than once on the floor of the Senate was the idea of having more transparency with the government and that more of the records of the government should be declassified. And I never quite figured out why I agreed with him as much as I did.

Moynihan:

Secrecy is a form of power which can be used inside government.

On screen:

Tony Bullock:

Bullock:

Moynihan viewed secrecy as almost a cancer in the U.S. government because it had become so absurd how we classify so much.

On screen:

Lawrence O’Donnell:

O’Donnell:

Senator Moynihan believed there are things worthy of secrecy. But he would argue that the more secrecy you have around anything, ultimately the less you will end up knowing about it.

On screen:

Redacted documents.

Moynihan:

It’s a romantic delusion that there’s a secret. There are none. Save when things are kept secret, they tend to be wrong. Keep that up and you will miss huge events and occupy yourself with marginal and unimportant events.

O’Donnell:

You know, in many ways, the 9/11 Commission report is an outgrowth of what Moynihan was saying about this — the CIA, with these massive silos of secrets that they couldn’t distinguish the value of. The FBI had massive silos, and they couldn’t distinguish what has value, what doesn’t.

Schumer:

One of my colleagues on the Republican side said, “You know, you couldn’t have a Senate of 100 Moynihans, but you sure need a Senate with one or two.”

[ Indistinct conversations ]

On screen:

Gray Maxwell at the staff reunion:

Maxwell:

I’ll just share one little vignette that I think is very characteristic of Senator Moynihan. There was a bankruptcy bill on the floor. I can’t remember what year it was. It was written by the credit-card industry to make it harder for people to discharge debts. So Senator Moynihan offered an amendment that said for people with below median income, the status quo would prevail. Senator Grassley from Iowa went down to the floor and attacked Senator Moynihan’s amendment.

Grassley:

This amendment says that people can purchase over $1,000 in luxury goods, like Gucci loafers and get over $1,000 in cash advances just minutes before declaring bankruptcy.

Maxwell:

He kept referring to “those people.” And he said, “Those people go out and buy Gucci loafers knowing that they’re not gonna pay for them.” And Senator Moynihan jumped up, and he said, “Parliamentary inquiry.”

Grassley:

…delay the amendment on the –

Presiding officer:

Senator will state his parliamentary inquiry.

Moynihan:

Mr. President, would it be in order for me to offer a second-degree amendment which excluded from the provisions of this amendment any purchase of Gucci loafers?

[ Laughter ]

Maxwell:

And you can hear on the tape the Senate parliamentarian whispering to Senator Hutchinson.

Presiding Officer:

It would be in order.

Moynihan:

I so move, sir.

Presiding officer:

Would the senator send the amendment to the desk?

Maxwell:

And at that point, Senator Moynihan just sort of waved him off in disgust…

Moynihan:

Mr. President, I’ve made my point. I withdraw my request.

Maxwell:

…and then launched into one of the most eloquent, extemporaneous, and poignant speeches about not picking on poor people.

[ Down-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

An older Moynihan stands by a window, framed in silhouette.

Primary Narrator:

Some 30 years after what he saw as a crisis in the impoverished Black family, the number of single parents in America had only expanded.

Moynihan:

An earthquake rumbled through the American family in the last 30 years. It began in some portions of our society, but it ended affecting all of them.

Primary Narrator:

Despite years of failed or stalled efforts, Moynihan remained firmly convinced that it was still the government’s role to lift these poor families from poverty. But government, Republicans claimed, had in fact been the prime cause of poverty and the exploding number of single-parent families.

[ Crowd cheering ] In 1994, Republicans swept into both houses of Congress, promising to overturn decades of liberal social policy.

On screen:

Newt Gingrich:

Man:

Let’s talk about what the welfare state has created. Let’s talk about the moral decay. What’s gone wrong is a welfare system which subsidized people for doing nothing.

Moynihan:

Through 11 presidents and 31 Congresses, we have sought to aid children in poverty. We have not always succeeded. But never, until now, have we undertaken to do harm.

Edin:

I think a lot of what he did in the earlier years, with the Family Assistance Plan, for example, was really playing offense.

On screen:

Professor Kathryn J. Edin:

Edin:

But what happened now was he was really playing defense.

On screen:

Subcommittee Staff Director Ron Haskins:

Haskins:

The history of AFDC showed that there were plenty of people willing to accept welfare and not work very much if at all. And so that’s what we wanted to change, and the only way to change it — You needed something forceful.

TV Reporter:

The bill ends the federal guarantee of cash assistance to the poor and largely turns welfare over to the states while cutting the growth of federal welfare spending…

On screen:

Ronald B. Mincy:

TV Reporter:

…$55 billion over six years.

Mincy:

Moynihan thought if the economy failed to cooperate, we were going to essentially pull the safety net out from under the feet of poor women and children and make them destitute, and there was nowhere for them to go.

On screen:

August 1996:

TV Reporter:

Good evening. Welfare as we know it is now history. President Clinton today signed the legislation that ends a government commitment made 61 years ago of federal aid to the nation’s poorest. “An historic opportunity for improvement…”

Moynihan:

If in ten years’ time, you find children sleeping on grates, picked up in the morning frozen, will anybody remember that there was a time when the federal government said it had a responsibility… for these matters?

On screen:

George Will:

Hill:

I was heavily influenced by my friend Pat Moynihan, who said that this would have worse consequences than, in fact, it had. He was wrong, and I was derivatively wrong.

TV Reporter:

The White House announced today that federal efforts to reform welfare have worked even better than expected.

TV Reporter:

Fourteen million Americans were on welfare in 1993. That number has been reduced by more than half…

Hill:

It did send many into the workforce. It did reduce welfare caseloads. It turned out that when the lifetime entitlement to welfare was repealed, people adapted. They were more adaptable than Pat thought.

TV Reporter:

…NBC’s Gwen Ifill reports, not all of the predictions of disaster have come true.

On screen:

Kathryn J. Edin:

Edin:

If you look at the decline in the rolls, the decline should start in 1997, right, when welfare reform is implemented across the states. But it doesn’t. It starts in 1994.

On screen:

A headline: Quiet War Against Poverty.

Primary Narrator:

That was when a 20-year-old poverty program called the earned-income tax credit was dramatically expanded by President Clinton. The program, targeted to poor working families, had been modeled on Moynihan’s more expansive Family Assistance Plan.

[ Down-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

“The most promising set of initiatives in a generation.”

Weisman:

The greatest legacy of Pat Moynihan — or one of the greatest — is that the program that he pioneered in the ’70s, in the early ’70s, is pretty much now there.

Mincy:

The basic idea was in the Family Assistance Plan, even if your wages are too low to support your children, we have made work manageable by providing an EITC.

Edith:

You can actually afford to go to work. We changed the rules, and people behaved like rational actors. And the EITC became this major engine that lifts people out of poverty.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

A woman holds a sign: ‘We Work Hard.’

Moynihan:

The fundamental thing is you will never solve the problem of poverty through the wage and employment system alone.

On screen:

1969:

Moynihan:

A great many people work full time, try to maintain their families, maintain an independent situation in life, and just don’t do it ’cause they don’t make enough money. And therefore, you must supplement their wages.

Edin:

For those who have managed to find full-time, full-year work, things have probably never been better, at least in modern history.

Mincy:

But what do you do with people who can’t work? We are seeing the deep poor, for whom there is no longer a safety net.

On screen:

Ron Haskins:

Haskins:

I have to admit that the problem that he was the most concerned about, namely that at the bottom there still is a large and apparently growing group of moms who are in deep poverty and, really — as ridiculous as it is to say this — nobody is doing much about it. Boy, if Moynihan were alive, he’d have 50 hearings next Tuesday morning on what are we gonna do to help these moms.

On screen:

A pensive Moynihan peers over his reading glasses.

TV Anchor:

When people talk to me about you, I always refer them to The Almanac of American Politics, which says, “He’s the nation’s best thinker among politicians since Lincoln and the best politician among thinkers since Jefferson.” How’s that sound?

Moynihan:

That sounds overstated.

TV Anchor:

[ Laughs ]

Moynihan:

But it’s a fine note on which to say it’s time to go.

Woman:

Moynihan retired in 2001 and was succeeded by Hillary Clinton, who announced his death today.

Man:

A small funeral procession carried the senator to his final resting place, Arlington National Cemetery, overlooking the city he loved.

[ Down-tempo music plays ]

On screen:

Photos of Moynihan recede through the years: speaking, smiling, growing younger. Ta-Nehisi Coates:

Coates:

You know, the Moynihan Report was the last point where you had a federal official making an argument — an implicit argument — for a massive investment in African-American communities, massive benevolent investment and tying that case for investment to history.

On screen:

A quote: The principal challenge is to make certain that equality of results will now follow. If we do not, there will be no social peace in the United States for generations. — The Moynihan Report

Coates:

That is something that just really wouldn’t happen today.

[ Music continues ]

Moynihan:

Pat always had a gray document case on the floor. As he’d read papers, reports, things, he’d drop notes to himself into that box. And when he died and I went through the last box that he’d been collecting — because that’s what he’s going to be working on — it was all about poverty, family poverty.

[ Music continues ]

On screen:

In a photo, a preteen Moynihan hugs his father.

Moynihan:

It is the finest work an American can have. And it’s not easy. As President Kennedy would say, “Democracy is a difficult kind of government. It demands all sorts of qualities of steadfastness, purpose, and integrity.” And then he said, “And it also requires knowledge.” I wish that was a little more clear — that there has to be an elemental knowledge of how our system works, what is involved, and you never are — You’re always behind that curve. But if you just don’t let it get lost altogether, you can do well enough, and that, I think, is about what, at the end of a fairly honorable day, most of us would be content to have judged about us.

On screen:

With deepest gratitude to Maura Moynihan.

Moynihan:

I’m not sure you can show anybody how to tie a bow tie. But you can tell them.

On screen:

Standing in front of the capitol building, Moynihan unties his bowtie.

Credits:

Narrated by Jeffrey Wright.

Director of Photography Roger Grange.

Edited by Aaron Kuhn.

Directed and Produced by Joseph Dorman and Toby Perl Freilich.

Executive Producer Andrew Karsch.

Written by Joseph Dorman.

Series Producer Julie Sacks.

Executive Producer Michael Kantor.

Moynihan:

You start at the beginning. Guess what you want to do first is you want to — Got to button that top button. Then you got to sort of locate your bow tie, and you put it on like that. Then you put down your collar. Right? Don’t think when you tie a bow tie. Just do it the way your mother taught you to tie your shoelaces when you were 14 months old. Mind, if you’ve never seen shoelaces, you probably will never tie a bow tie.

Logos:
Framework Films, Riverside Films, and the WNET Group.

END

TRANSCRIPT

♪♪ ♪♪ -What is a senator?

One percent of one half of one of the three branches of government.

Unless, of course, you're Mr. Moynihan.

♪♪ His life was one of the broadest and deepest public careers in American history.

-Politician, social philosopher, and statesman... Daniel Patrick Moynihan's wide-ranging influence can still be felt today.

-I don't think you get many people in public life who have this kind of unique insight, from highway safety to welfare... -Social and family policy... -The role of the United Nations... -Infrastructure... -Public architecture... -Or Social Security.

-Secrecy in government... -In the last half of the 20th century, Daniel Patrick Moynihan was at the center of America's most urgent political debates.

-Equality and liberty are two different things.

-He served four consecutive presidents and was elected to four terms in the Senate.

It all began with his fight for America's poor.

-Things are not getting better for everybody!

There is a group of Americans for whom things get worse.

-I certainly have memories of when the Moynihan Report exploded into controversy.

-He rose to national celebrity as America's most famous representative to the United Nations.

-One word that's attached to you wherever you go until you're probably sick to death of it is "flamboyant."

"The flamboyant Patrick Moynihan."

-Am I embarrassed to speak for a less-than-perfect democracy?

Not one bit.

Find me a better one.

♪♪ -He was a man shaped by the Depression.

He saw government do an enormous amount of good.

-He was always a liberal who knew that Liberalism thrived only when it could question itself.

-Moynihan hated the notion that government is the problem.

His own rejoinder to that was, "If you have contempt for government, you will get contemptible government."

♪♪ -There's no doubt in my mind that if Pat Moynihan had been airdropped into New England in the 1770s, he would've been one of the most prominent members of our founding fathers.

♪♪ -The great challenges of our time have been challenges of ideas.

♪♪ Politics is an argument about the future.

♪♪ [ Crowd cheering ] [ Fanfare plays ] ♪♪ -When the Kennedy administration swept into office, the New Frontier, and there's this great excitement, the greatest since the New Deal.

Brilliant people are leaving the Ivy League.

They're going to Washington.

-1960 election brought Jack Kennedy to town.

Was supposed to empower the American professoriate.

It was academia's moment.

-And the idea was technocratic problem-solving.

And that was Moynihan's specialty.

♪♪ -Moynihan at the time was teaching social policy at Syracuse University.

He had worked for New York Governor Averell Harriman and was yearning to get back into politics.

When Kennedy came along, it was, I would imagine, love at first sight.

Kennedy was an intellectual.

He went to Harvard.

He was a war hero.

He was Irish.

-I went into the Labor Department as an assistant to that great man Arthur Goldberg.

-It's not entirely plain what his role was except, I think, that Arthur Goldberg enjoyed having a clever young man tossing out ideas.

He had this extraordinary ability, amounting almost to genius, for seeing the broader implications in what other people would regard as banal facts.

For example, he got a rather casual interest in the rebuilding of Pennsylvania Avenue, and he extrapolated that into a brilliant piece of writing about what should be the principles of federal architecture, which is still used by the government of the United States to this day.

-Solemnity gives way to celebration as the traditional Inaugural Parade... -These were seen as wonderful times economically in the United States.

-...birth of a new generation of Americans.

-Poverty had not really been an issue since the 1930s.

-People forget that the great inaugural speech that Kennedy made, there was no mention of any domestic issues.

♪♪ -And then in '63, things began to change.

[ Indistinct shouting ] -You had a Civil Rights Movement that would not rest, that was looking for equality for African-Americans now.

And intertwined with the Civil Rights Movement was seeing that there was a poverty problem.

♪♪ -Michael Harrington.

Author and expert on poverty.

-One of the most terrible things about poor people is that they are people who are literally without hope.

And when you stick them off in a corner of the society, where most of the people don't even know they exist anymore, they feel, rightly, that they're left out, that nobody cares, that there's no place for them.

-Kennedy certainly read "The Other America" by Michael Harrington.

And the administration was moving towards seeing poverty as an important political issue in a very cautious way.

[ Applause ] When Lyndon Johnson came in, he's, "We're going to do this nationally and we're going to do it big."

-And this administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.

[ Applause ] -Moynihan was one of the people -- Moynihan, being an Assistant Secretary of Labor in early '64, was one of the people who helped Johnson design what became known as the War on Poverty.

-It was ultimately headed by Sargent Shriver.

-[Chuckling] I remember...

There was one week when they were really trying to draw up what it would be.

And every -- They all were working in other places and, at 5:00, would show up at our house.

[ Laughs ] And it was Adam Yarmolinsky -- came from Defense Department.

Frank Mankiewicz.

Pat's friend Mike Harrington, who'd written the book on poverty.

And Pat.

And the War on Poverty was planned over spaghetti dinners at the Moynihans'.

[ Laughs ] -For the first time in our history, an America without hunger is a practical prospect.

-We're only at the beginning of the road to the Great Society.

♪♪ -I've been unemployed now since 1962.

I need a job.

-I've been out of work over four years.

I'll go down and try to get work and can't get no work.

-Moynihan, as early as early 1964, is writing memoranda about the need to do something special for poor Black people, as opposed to all poor people.

-I felt that the great crises having to do with the protection of the liberties of Negro Americans in the South were probably coming to an end.

It seemed to me that we would now turn to the problems of the Northern ghettos, the Northern slums, where just passing a law wasn't going to change things, where problems were much more difficult.

-Moynihan's interest in urban Black poverty was triggered, in part, by a study he had led a year earlier.

Eager to boost its ranks during the Cold War, the military was concerned that too many men were failing their exams.

What Moynihan found was that many of them came from single-parent homes, and a disproportionate number were impoverished Black men.

-Moynihan sat down to write his report on the Black family, which was titled "The Negro Family: The Case for National Action," on January 1st, or thereabouts, 1965... and, with the help of Paul Barton, a chief aide, finished it in the remarkably quick time of little more than three months.

-That report began, "The United States is facing a new crisis in race relations."

♪♪ -Teenage unemployment in the Negro world today is almost 25%.

That is a social crime!

That's an outrage!

-He was one of the first scholars to integrate structural analysis, for example, the problems of urbanization, joblessness, Jim Crow segregation, and so on, and their effects on the Black population... and cultural analysis.

That is, the way Blacks respond to chronic, racial, and economic subordination.

And sometimes the response is problematic.

-The very start of the second chapter says, "At the heart of the deterioration of the fabric of Negro society is the deterioration of the Negro family."

-Moynihan immersed himself in a raft of statistics that convinced him impoverished Black families were under enormous stress, their children deeply affected.

By 1960, nearly 24% of these families were headed by single parents.

This was some 8 times greater than the rate for white families.

-How'd you learn how to behave?

From your father and your mother and the people around you.

Well, supposing there is no father, where children are just brought up without that support which a family gives it.

Then what do you end up with?

You end up with the cycle reproducing itself.

-That report was intended for one person -- president of the United States, Lyndon Baines Johnson.

-Moynihan writes a memo to President Johnson, appealing to him to understand.

"You were born poor, yet you came of age full of ambition, energy, and ability because your mother and father gave it to you.

The richest inheritance any child can have is a stable, loving, disciplined family life."

And he's trying to get Johnson to understand this culture of poverty and racism that was assaulting the poor Negro family.

♪♪ -The insight that he had was that we have to go beyond civil-rights legislation to address the cumulative effects of chronic, racial, and economic subordination.

And what he was saying was that we need to move beyond issues of liberty and address issues of equality.

♪♪ ♪♪ [ Applause ] And Johnson incorporates that thought into one of the most important addresses any president has ever given.

[ Applause ] -But freedom is not enough.

You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race, and then say, "You are free to compete with all the others," and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.

-This is the core of the liberal anthem that LBJ stood for.

[ Applause ] -I remember listening very carefully to President Johnson's speech at Howard University in 1965.

And I said, you know, "This...

This resonates with me."

[ Applause ] And it was based on the Moynihan Report.

So it's unfortunate that it turned out to be so controversial down the road.

♪♪ -Daniel Patrick Moynihan has been a public figure for so long as a writer and an advisor to Presidents and ambassador to the U.N.

Senator Moynihan, if I could get just a touch of personal color, I always thought, as far back as I first saw your picture, that you were what they call I believe "to the manner born."

I would have thought of you silver spoon in the mouth, so on, finest schools, yachting as a boy, and so on.

And I was startled when I learned that you had quite a different background.

You grew up in Hell's Kitchen, in Harlem.

You went to City College.

You've been a stevedore.

You've ridden the rails, I believe, and you had.. -Well, it was a single-parent family.

Three kids.

He was the oldest.

-His father abandoned the family.

He was growing up in the 1930s when most families were intact, when divorce or desertion was uncommon.

-As he once said to me, it's not as though he walked out the door one day to get a pack of cigarettes and never came back.

He left over time.

So it took a year or two until it was clear he was never going to come back.

♪♪ -Pat was poor, but it was because his family was divorced and his father lost his job.

It wasn't because -- And drank.

His parents drank.

It wasn't because they'd never made it out of that immigrant status.

-If you do start in a middle-class family and lose that, in this case because of marital breakdown, it's probably more scary than, for example, if your parents are hard-rock miners and don't know anything but that.

-His mother was a nurse, and she was having a hard time financially, and she married a new man, and it produced a new baby.

And so they moved from the city, somewhere in the city, to Kitchawan.

Pat was definitely a city boy, interested in things citified.

He read the newspapers, and kids in eighth grade there didn't read the newspapers.

He spoke about things that I didn't know about and didn't give a damn about -- John L. Lewis and Walter Reuther and the coal miners and the auto workers.

When you saw him in class, he'd sit in one of these little wooden chairs, and his arms would flail out, his legs would spread out, and he looked like Ichabod Crane.

He was...different.

♪♪ -I don't know why these two brothers were so different in their response to the father leaving.

Michael all his life talked about missing a father, not having had a father.

But Pat didn't.

And, in fact, Michael would occasionally say to Pat, "You know, you're -- you're not the father I need."

♪♪ -After two years, Moynihan's mother was a single parent once again and moved the family back to New York City.

♪♪ -It was a little grungy apartment in Astoria.

I do know that it seemed to be a wretched family situation.

-He was always afraid of poverty for himself.

Certainly his friends thought, in later years, that he worried too much about losing jobs.

Underneath his tremendous charm, energy, ebullience, there was also a little grain of fear, I think.

Not physical fear.

He was not a coward.

I don't mean that.

He was just afraid of the abyss.

-This is Dad and President Johnson, who nev-- Ken Galbraith told me that Johnson didn't like or trust Moynihan 'cause he was a Northeast liberal, a Kennedy man.

-Time was getting at hand to get out of Washington, so I decided to take a two-dollar bet and run for president of the city council.

-♪ He's our man, hallelujah ♪ -Kennedy appointees had a difficult time leaving the Johnson administration.

-♪ Moynihan, hallelujah ♪ -But if you left to run for office, it was okay.

When the primary was over and we had lost, I explained to my children that we were celebrating because the only thing worse than losing would have been winning.

[ Laughs ] ♪♪ -On July 19, 1965, The New York Times announced what would be Moynihan's unsuccessful candidacy for City Council.

That same day, a second article reported an anonymous internal government study on the state of the Negro family.

-The report leaked in the summer of 1965.

The timing is very important here because what happens also in the summer of 1965 is the awful Watts riot.

[ Indistinct shouting ] [ Sirens wailing ] -Absolutely incredible scene, with gun battle in the middle of Broadway... [ Gunshots ] 34 persons were killed, all but 5 of them Negros, in the middle of the nation's third-largest city.

[ Indistinct shouting ] -And people were trying to come up with an explanation of, "Why did they riot?"

-As the smoke lifted above Watts and the shooting died down, the soul searching and blame shifting began.

♪♪ -Various columns appeared, including one by Evans and Novak, who were famous columnists in those days.

That was titled "The Moynihan Report."

And that's probably the first time that it really became known that way.

♪♪ -And then people started associating the Watts riot with the Black family.

"This is a cause of the Watts riot.

The deterioration of the family has helped to trigger these riots."

-If you're, say, in the activist community and you're an African-American, well, the first lens that you have on the Moynihan Report is from Mary McGrory or, you know, it's from Evans and Novak.

That's the lens through which you read this report.

♪♪ ♪♪ -It came from a white intellectual, at what could not have been conceived as anything but poor timing because it overrode what certainly the African-American leadership and community believed needed to be exercised.

"Alright, government, for 150 years, you've done nothing!

No legislation against job discrimination.

No legislation giving people the right to vote.

The poll tax still out there.

if you were a white man in Mississippi, you could go to work in a laboring job and become middle-class.

If you were a Black man that had the same non-skills, you couldn't get a job at all.

What are you going to do about that?

You talking about my family?!"

If anything, the Black family, along with the Black Church, is all that kept the Black community whole.

-This is Len Brooks inviting you to...Meet the Press.

Our guest today is the author of the controversial study "The Negro Family," Mr. Daniel P. Moynihan.

-Pat was blindsided by the reaction of the left to what he was saying.

-What's your explanation for the fact that it's being criticized for fostering a new racism?

-I think there may have been a misunderstanding.

I was trying to show that unemployment statistics, which are so dull, and you've read so many of them, and you don't know what they mean, they're hard to believe -- That unemployment nonetheless ended up with orphaned children, with abandoned mothers, with men living furtive lives without even an address.

That unemployment had flesh and blood and it could bleed.

-One of the reasons why the Moynihan Report ended up blowing up in Moynihan's face is the document was never meant for public perusal.

It is written in a very bombastic way.

It was written to get the attention of politicians.

-Unless you took the time -- and who does -- to look into what Moynihan himself said were the causes, you would have taken up this view that these people just have to get their families together, and everything will be fine.

♪♪ And that was what many in the Black community believed they had to rebut.

-They intend to build within Black people the realization that that problem is not theirs, that it's created by White society.

It's purposely created by White society, and then they throw it back on us and blame us.

-And a book came out by William Ryan called "Blaming the Victim."

-...by William Ryan, a Harvard psychologist, who criticizes your report.

"The implicit point is that Negroes tolerate promiscuity, illegitimacy, and everything else that is supposed to follow."

Now, how do you answer those charges?

-I'm not responsible for the fact that he can't read.

The point about the family is that it's a good place to see the results of unemployment, the results of discrimination, the results of bad housing and poor education.

And you can't do anything about a family life if men don't have jobs, if school children don't have good schools, if people live in ghettos.

-There's a very ironical development in all of this, you know, because, um, up until the Moynihan Report, almost all writings on the problems that Black Americans face emphasize not just racism, but the fact that the years of oppression, of slavery, of Jim Crow had distorted aspects of Black life.

-Remember just one thing if I may say -- that my report basically simply develops the work of the great American sociologist E. Franklin Frazier, whose book on the Negro family, published in 1939, in an uncanny way, predicted that this would happen.

-The racial confrontation in America... -Kenneth Clark, Bayard Rustin, a lot of Black leaders endorsed the report and felt that Moynihan was unjustly criticized.

-Martin Luther King called him.

And Pat never used to take -- He never answered the phone.

I answered the phone.

So I actually would often listen.

And Martin Luther King was calling him about the report and said that Pat had analyzed it very well and there's much in it that he agreed with.

And he said, "I hope you understand why I can't publicly support you."

Because he himself was under attack from the young Black radicals.

♪♪ -Johnson became very angry with Moynihan once the report became known.

Here's a president who'd done more for civil rights than any other president.

Various Black leaders said it then, with two civil-rights acts, and they're dumping on his administration through Moynihan.

♪♪ And Moynihan really started feeling very sorry for himself.

-I do think that he was hurt personally by the way in which the Moynihan Report was received.

♪♪ -My wife and I bought an apartment on the West Side of Manhattan, and we were very proud of it, and we invited the Moynihans for dinner.

And as they were coming in the door Senator Moynihan said to Liz, "I broke into this building once."

And Liz was -- Liz was as surprised as could be because he never talked about that part of his life.

He said, "During the Depression, these buildings along West End Avenue were boarded up.

And so after school, I would get enough money to eat and then break into one or another of these buildings to sleep and then get up the next day and go to school."

♪♪ -He didn't talk very much about his youth.

In fact, he didn't talk at all about his youth.

He had to say some things because soon he was a politician and he was asked things.

And he had a few set lines about, um -- about shining shoes on 42nd Street... -You shined shoes just down the street a ways, huh?

-Used to shine shoes at 42nd.

I was raised on -- Not "raised" because in those days -- No one can remember this in Manhattan, with rent control, anymore.

In those days, everybody moved on the first of October, because you got one month's rent free.

-Although he had this erudite, almost patrician persona, he loved his working-class identity.

-I graduated then went straight to work on the piers, on the North River piers.

-I mean, that was authentic about him, but there was a little bit of the "I grew up in a log cabin" kind of thing that a lot of politicians do.

-A friend of mine just showed up over at Pier 48 at the end of the day, and he said, "You know, they're giving exams for City College.

Why don't we go up and take them?

I'm going to go up.

Do you want to come with me?"

-City College in New York was free and explicitly designed for poor, bright students like Pat Moynihan.

He studied in the evenings and continued to work on the docks during the day to support himself.

-He was a big fan of Thomas Wolfe.

"Look Homeward, Angel."

And he said that the foreman on the docks told him, "Okay, guys, take five.

We got to switch the cars."

So he took his copy of Wolfe, crawled up on top of the railcar, started reading, and promptly fell asleep.

And he said he was rudely awakened by the stevedore from a "benign slumber."

One of his favorite words was "benign."

And he was fired.

[ Laughs ] -As World War II was drawing to a close, the 17-year-old Moynihan volunteered for the navy.

Testing into an officer's training program, he was sent to Middlebury College in Vermont and then, with the war's end, to Tufts University, where he eventually earned a doctorate.

For Moynihan, it was an entrée into a new world.

♪♪ -I think one of the things that -- that he liked about me was that I was -- had the sort of life that he wished he'd had.

You know, I had a secure, loving family.

I was a totally separate relationship to this home life that he -- I don't know whether he was embarrassed or ashamed.

He -- He...

But he...

It's not something he talked about.

But at that part of our life, we were ready for anything.

If a door opened, we walked through it.

The Navy was a way to get a free education.

Those were doors that opened.

And I think the open doors for Pat were intellectual, ideas.

-At one point, when Pat was in his second year at the Fletcher School of International Law and Diplomacy at Tufts, at his mother's bar, somehow -- somebody got stabbed, and the bar was deserted.

So Pat left Fletcher for two months, went down to the bar, ran the bar, and then returned to Fletcher and graduated valedictorian.

Extraordinary ability.

-His mother lived above the bar, and I remember one time that we spent the night on the floor.

And she said to me something like, "I'm so sorry that a boy like you is a friend of Pat's"... ...the point being that he was bad news.

She was sorry for me, that I had gotten involved with Pat.

-If you read his diaries in the early 1950s, he was going through psychotherapy at the time, so the diary reveals his deeply emotional, mixed feelings about his father, whom he actually loved and had wonderful memories and tender memories of.

And yet, because the father abandoned the family, he seemed to have felt obligated to hate his father.

-The boys were brought up that their father was a very bad man who had fallen apart.

Actually, when Pat's brother Mike went out to find him in California, they found a guy who was the editor of the Sunday edition of a major newspaper who had married again, with several children.

-But Pat, you know, never...

Didn't attempt to be in touch with him.

-You know, Liz Moynihan was also abandoned by her father.

If you read Russell Baker's memoir, there were men who just, as he put it, "disappeared into the Depression."

♪♪ -But a government cared about the high school I went to, cared about a free college, the first in history, the City College of New York.

Went to universities, colleges, great places.

Four advanced degrees.

I never saw a tuition bill in my life.

And something I realize -- how different that experience is from those of most young people today.

I'm a generation which I don't think will be reproduced now for a while, which is deeply respectful of American government and owes -- owes so much to it.

-One reason Moynihan is so interesting is because he inhabited two worlds at once.

He inhabited the world of practical politics.

He also inhabited the world of the liberal intellectual.

And in his day, the people who wrote for small magazines, for little journals, which had an influence we almost can't imagine today -- a publication like Commentary or The Public Interest, which Moynihan really helped create -- had tremendous intellectual cachet.

That's where the ideas would begin and then reverberate through the society.

♪♪ -Moynihan's public writing, like his government work, often used data to reframe issues in novel ways.

His article for The Reporter magazine in 1959, "Epidemic on the Highways," was a classic example.

It drew on epidemiological studies to show that traffic fatalities were not the result of human error but poor car design.

-A lot of people read it and were very impressed, and it was almost, like, the beginning of the effort to raise levels of safety in automobiles in the United States.

♪♪ -I first met Pat in 1961 when I called him up and told him I'd like him to write for Commentary, and he said he'd be delighted.

-At that time, I'd become involved in a project on ethnic groups of New York City.

I wanted to find someone who both had some intellectual sophistication, but also had direct experience and involvement.

Irving Kristol, who was editing The Reporter magazine, said, "You should talk to Pat Moynihan," and so we met.

-Irresistible.

And he always was.

The charm.

The wit.

Always a lot of fun.

-We'd have these long walks in New York, and we'd -- [ Laughs ] observe the buildings and sometimes step into a bar and so on.

And he always drank much more than I did, but it didn't seem to affect him in any way.

And eventually Pat wrote a wonderful essay on the Irish in New York and America.

-When it was published in 1963, Glazer and Moynihan's book, "Beyond the Melting Pot," transformed how ethnicity was viewed.

It challenged the notion of an homogenized America and instead presented a country of jostling ethnic groups.

-There had been this idea that we'd all come over here, we were all different.

We'd go into a melting pot, which is... -Israel Zangwill.

-Israel Zangwill.

-The play.

"The Melting Pot."

-Right!

But that was our creed and our hope.

What we looked at was a city in which that hadn't happened at all.

And if wasn't going to be there in New York, it wasn't going to be there anywhere.

-Pat Moynihan was very proud and really claimed, I think with some justification, that he was present at the creation of this whole idea of studying ethnicity as a serious academic subject.

♪♪ -I remember I was raised on 42nd Street and taught to think that all the people that lived on 43rd Street and 11th Avenue were somehow...animals and against us enlightened people who lived on 42nd Street and 11th Avenue.

We're a pretty mixed up population, always have been, and are always going to have some of the tensions that come with this.

That's one of the things that makes life interesting in the city.

♪♪ [ Siren wailing ] ♪♪ -1967 was the third summer of the burning and looting of the Black ghettos.

This was Newark in July.

-Mounting violence, lawlessness, and disorder that is taking place in our cities across the country has created the most serious domestic crisis since the end of the Civil War.

♪♪ -Two years ago, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, then Assistant Secretary of Labor, now director of the Joint Center for Urban Studies at Harvard and MIT, wrote a report that foreshadowed some of the events that have so shocked us these last summers.

The report began, "The United States is approaching a new crisis in race relations."

-Somehow the Negro world itself has been pulling apart.

On the one hand, a working class, middle class... -Moynihan, now out of government, used his new position at Harvard to analyze social policy and to focus public attention on the causes and problems of Black poverty.

♪♪ -I was a freshman at Harvard in '67, and Pat Moynihan's course was well-known because he was a brilliant man, but he had practical experience.

-I wonder if you'd give us what your ideas or thoughts are as to why we're facing these kinds of problems.

-Gunnar Myrdal described it a couple years ago.

He said, "The United States is building up an underclass."

-He was a bridge between academic thought and government.

And there were very few bridges that were as strong, as durable, and had as much a foot in each camp as he did.

The course was vintage Pat Moynihan.

It led with policy.

-Policy like the War on Poverty.

By the time it was finally enacted, President Johnson had chosen to focus on education and empowerment rather than on jobs or money.

-This is a community beginning to act.

-The irony of Pat Moynihan is that he's pushing for equality of results and for poverty programs, but at the same time as these programs are being developed, he becomes very skeptical of them.

-New York's poor are demanding a voice in decisions that affect their lives.

-To him, the War on Poverty was creating a costly bureaucracy to engage in social engineering instead of giving the money directly to the poor who needed it.

-...majority in the House Appropriations Committee, sir.

-What Moynihan really wanted was a large-scale jobs program along the lines of the New Deal, the Works Progress Administration, the WPA.

He was a big fan of Franklin Roosevelt.

Johnson didn't want to do that.

He didn't want to spend a lot of money on jobs.

Government jobs programs are expensive.

-I think the United States government can become the employer of last resort, so that, in effect, anyone seeking work, not finding it after a point, a job is found for him, period!

-Moynihan's idea was to prepare people to work and put them to work so that they would have jobs with which they would be able to sustain their position in the family.

-One of Pat's great lines was, "We can do more for the Black family by doubling the delivery of mail than any other way."

[ Laughs ] What he meant was, we could create 50,000 jobs for men if we just had two deliveries a day.

-...feel this country reaching a general consensus... -The advocacy for unequal, preferential treatment.

The advocacy for a minimum level of income for the family.

The advocacy for a big jobs program.

The kind of solutions Moynihan advocated for are -- I would say even in the time were radical and are very, very radical now.

-By the mid-'60s and certainly by the late '60s, there was crushing disappointment.

The riots in the cities.

And there was the disappointments of the War on Poverty.

[ Indistinct shouting ] -Johnson saw his hopes for a great society overwhelmed by the pain and anger in the country over the escalating war in Vietnam.

[ Indistinct chanting ] -By 1965, we had 184,000 troops in Vietnam.

And by the end of 1966, we had around 400,000.

-And the cost of maintaining and perpetuating that war was overriding almost all other expenditures.

It was very hard for Moynihan to accept that.

-We have been saying we're going to get rid of these problems.

We have been saying we're going to have full employment, we're going to have good housing, we're going to have equal opportunity.

And it never happens.

[ Radio chatter ] -Hey, hey, LBJ!

How many kids did you kill today?!

-We speak of the violence of poor Blacks.

Now there is the violence of affluent Whites.

[ Indistinct shouting ] -So all of these things send liberalism crashing to the ground.

[ Indistinct shouting ] -My friends, let me make one thing clear.

This is a nation of laws.

And as Abraham Lincoln has said, "No one is above the law, no one is below the law, and we're going to enforce the law."

And Americans should remember that if we're going to have law and order.

[ Cheers and applause ] -I think there is a mood of people saying, "We've given you all we can.

We're not going to give you any more.

We're sick of it."

And talking about "law and order."

Alright.

Law and order.

We know that.

But you can have law and order in a penal camp.

You haven't achieved much.

-I remember picking up and sending the Moynihan Report in to a candidate for president named Nixon, who was in the middle of his comeback.

And he came back, interestingly enough, with, "This guy Moynihan."

[ Laughter ] "You suppose we can get him to talk to us?"

And I said, "He's a Democrat, He's a professor.

Worked in the Kennedy administration."

And Nixon said, "Well, that's three strikes, but maybe..." [ Laughter ] And the word went out.

♪♪ -Someone came up from the president-elect's transition office and said that the president would like to meet him.

Would he come down?

Nixon told him that he himself was an expert on foreign policy and that he knew what he wanted to do.

He said, "One word.

China."

But he did not know about domestic policy.

-Ladies and gentlemen, I have another major announcement with regard to the White House staff.

-When he came back and he told me that Nixon had asked him to be his Domestic Advisor and that he accepted, I was enraged, I have to tell you.

I was just devastated, but furious.

[ Laughs ] -When he went into the Nixon administration, against the advice of his wife and friends -- Nixon was the devil.

Going to work for Nixon was a disgrace.

-Presidents don't need advisors who agree with them about everything.

They agree with you, then you've got one man on the payroll you don't need.

-He had no stake in Nixon.

He had a stake, as he felt it, in the presidency.

-You can come home every weekend.

You can commute.

We're not going to move.

-His Urban Affairs advisor, Daniel Moynihan, told how the new administration hopes to attack urban problems.

-As Moynihan said to me in my interview for the job with him, he said, "John, I want you to work with me on everything I'm doing."

And he said, "That is domestic policy.

That is urban policy.

And that is, therefore, policy about the Black community."

-Now, having an urban policy is no more a guarantor of success with cities than having a foreign policy is a guarantor of success in, say, world peace.

But it's a condition of success.

I mean, you have to start... -Moynihan's portfolio was the newly created Council on Urban Affairs.

But its chairman was the president himself, making the council the powerful center for all domestic policy in the Nixon administration.

♪♪ -Pat was like a Roman candle going up.

The sparks were in the sky all over the place.

You'd go into a meeting with him, and you really wouldn't know what was on his mind.

He could be all over the line.

-Pat was a ginger man in some ways.

He was a yeasty, idea-creating person.

For example, he brought in Bruno Bettelheim, who had written of children in the kibbutz in Israel and about the importance of early child development, and, forthwith, Nixon created the first office of Early Child Development in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

And whom did Pat put in charge of it?

James Farmer, the head of CORE.

♪♪ -Pat Moynihan wrote probably the first memo about global warming in the American government, written in 1969.

And that is part of how the Nixon presidency became so active on the environment.

-He would be in agriculture under food problems, hunger problems.

He could be in the Department of Commerce under giving jobs to minorities.

He loved the diversity of the job that he was given.

-President Nixon has proposed a comprehensive anti-hunger package designed to make sure all Americans get enough to eat.

His statement was read by Patrick Moynihan.

-The moment is at hand to put an end to hunger in America itself.

It is a moment to act with vigor.

It is a moment to be recalled with pride.

-We were in the basement of the West Wing.

Right above us, on the first floor, was the president, the Oval Office.

Then you went down one flight, and there was not only Pat Moynihan and his staff.

There was also the Situation Room, Henry Kissinger and his staff.

So you go down one flight, and you're in the territory of these former Harvard professors.

-They were in a kind of implicit competition.

Kissinger thought he had the more important position as National Security Advisor.

At the beginning, certainly, the role that Pat was playing as Chief Domestic Advisor had the spotlight.

And I don't think Henry was very happy about that.

-It's an interesting thing with Richard Nixon.

He had these sort of love affairs with a person, where suddenly there's some person who is special -- "Some person who has something useful and helpful to me."

And it happened with Pat Moynihan at exactly the right time -- like, Easter 1969.

When everything was coming together, the one that Richard Nixon wanted to have around him, quietly, alone, was Pat Moynihan.

-It's a very interesting question about the relationship with the president on substance.

Because it is a combination of Pat being a very adept courtier, on the one hand, frankly, which he did with color and verve and anecdotes and historical records, but, on the other hand, really trying to get the president to think large and to see himself in a very big historical context.

The Blake biography of Benjamin Disraeli, which Pat drew to the president's attention, was a case in point.

I mean, Pat was trying to show how Disraeli, as a conservative, had taken the Tory party and moved it into deep concern for the poor and the lower middle classes and to show, by implication at least, that Nixon could do just the same thing for the Republican party.

-His eyes still on the impoverished Black family, Moynihan seized on the issue of welfare.

[ Telephone rings ] Its rolls had doubled in the '60s and become the object of Republican scorn.

Major reform of the program, he believed, was an idea that might capture Richard Nixon's imagination.

♪♪ -Whatever else you think about Nixon, he came from a hardscrabble background, as did Pat Moynihan.

And they found common cause.

There was an instinctual level.

It was like Moynihan would hit a tuning fork with Richard Nixon talking about some of these issues of poverty and difficulty of making your way.

♪♪ -Nixon wrote about what it had been like as a boy -- poor boy, but not as poor -- his father had a little store in Whittier, California -- as the other kids who came into the store whose parents were on welfare, who he felt were scarred for life.

He wasn't scarred for life because he had parents who were an intact family.

-The problem of welfare is the problem of dependency.

It is different from poverty.

Poverty is a condition which, historically and into our time, is never enviable but is often associated with very fine personal qualities.

Dependent persons which are -- who are brave, who are resourceful, who are courageous -- are nonetheless never envied.

The buried image of the word "dependent."

People who are poor stand on their own feet.

People who are dependent hang.

-Welfare, known as Aid to Families with Dependent Children, or AFDC, had been designed to help widows with children during the Depression.

Over time, it had evolved into a national poverty program but remained targeted at single mothers.

-You know, if there's a male in the house, the women and the kids don't get a penny, you know, if the male's not working.

That was the way AFDC worked.

So Pat and Nixon wanted to fix it.

-Moynihan proposed to Nixon a program that would completely remake American social policy towards the poor.

The Family Assistance Plan, in Moynihan's eyes, would remove the stigma of welfare by giving support to all struggling families in America, whether the parents were working or not.

[ Fanfare plays ] -The reason that Senator Moynihan liked it was because Social Security had worked so well.

-The new government plan for old-age security.

-And the way Social Security works is the government sends people a check.

It doesn't send people an administrator to tell them how to run their home.

It doesn't interfere in their lives in any way.

People weren't telling you what to do or how to spend the money, but they were -- He thought that the difference between the rich and poor was that the rich had money and the poor didn't.

-You know, Bill, what we're trying to do here is more important I think perhaps than just the substance of the program.

We're trying to bring government back a little closer to what it is it can be said it knows how to do.

-Mm-hmm.

Mm-hmm.

-One of the great, heartbreaking experiences of the 1960s was to see government try to do so many things, and good things, only somehow to fail because, in fact, no one knows how to do those things.

That old 19th-century saying that it's not ignorance that hurts so much as knowing all those things that ain't so."

-Getting the president to support what was basically a negative income tax, which he campaigned against.

What a turnover, to go before the American people and say, "Welfare has failed.

And, by the way, I'm proposing something that's going to cost more money!"

-That is why tonight I therefore propose that we abolish the present welfare system and that we adopt in its place a new Family Assistance system.

What I am proposing is that the federal government build a foundation under the income of every American family with dependent children that can not care for itself.

-Our guest today on "Meet the Press" is the assistant to the president for urban affairs, Daniel P. Moynihan.

-Why is it necessary to get so many more people onto the public assistance rolls in order to move people off?

-Mr. Oberdorfer, it is necessary to provide them Family Assistance payments because they are poor, because they do not now have the income that is needed to maintain a decent standard of life.

The president's proposal will triple the number of children receiving assistance.

But this is not welfare.

Most of those children will be in families with fathers who get up in the morning and go off and work a long, hard day and a long, hard week and it just doesn't bring back enough money.

-The response to the Family Assistance Program is quite remarkable.

Michael Harrington, a leading socialist writer on urban affairs in the United States, calls it the most radical program since the New Deal.

-John Gardner, the head of the Urban Coalition, said it was "an historic step."

It'll abolish two-thirds of the poverty in this country in one step.

-The White House staff realized it would be a hard slog in the Senate.

-There were certainly liberals, liberal Democrats mostly, who were unhappy because it seemed to be so little money.

-Fannie Lou Hamer, founder of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party.

-You've got to realize the sickness that's happening in this country while the man is talking about giving a welfare family $1,600 -- This is about as bad as it is in Mississippi.

-Some of them used the acronym F.A.P.

as meaning "...America's Poor."

-California's governor, Ronald Reagan, told the Senate Finance Committee he still opposes the administration's proposal for a guaranteed yearly income.

-The president and I share completely the belief in the need for welfare reform and in the belief that something must be done to induce more people to work.

I didn't believe that the Family Assistance portion of that plan did this.

-Chairman Russell Long and committee conservatives hope to kill the bill.

-The chairman of the finance committee, Russell Long, Democrat from Louisiana, certainly didn't like a program that somehow was more advantageous to Blacks than to whites.

In fact, more money went to whites just because there were more whites, but as a percentage, he was right.

-So you had pressure from below for more, and you had pressure from above for less.

-President Nixon reluctantly now is willing to compromise on his welfare reform plan.

He is in fact now pleading for a compromise.

My dear lady, it is five minutes to midnight.

We have taken this great piece of legislation through the House.

Now the president knows that if this bill is reported to the floor of the Senate, it will be overwhelmingly enacted.

And to fail now would be to fail the nation and to fail the poor of the nation.

[ Down-tempo music plays ] -Nixon himself was still saying, "You know, don't worry about the little stuff.

You're gonna get kicked in the shins all the time about this and that and the other thing."

He said, "The really important things are the big things, like Family Assistance, which we will get."

And he said, "Pat Moynihan will be able to hold his head up for the rest of his life."

-Good evening.

The Senate today shelved welfare reform for perhaps five to eight years.

Instead, as anticipated, it voted to continue the present system.

-It failed in the Senate by one vote.

Nixon could have gotten the vote from a Republican.

Lyndon Johnson, if it were a comparable situation and he was going to the Senate, boy, he would've squeezed a senator till he got the vote.

-There was agreement today that this is the end of the road for welfare reform and vigorous disagreement on who's at fault.

-The Family Assistance Plan ultimately died in Congress.

But Moynihan's conservative rivals in the White House had been maneuvering to kill it almost from the beginning.

-As you may have noticed, there has been a small brouhaha lately over a secret memorandum to the president that suddenly appeared in all the public print.

-Daniel Patrick Moynihan of the president's White House staff sent Mr. Nixon a private memorandum on race relations, but somehow it became public.

-The publication of that memo has caused a furor at the White House, as ABC's... -The memo was one of these beginning-of-the-year situations -- "This is where we are.

"This is where we should be this year."

The state of the African-Americans is really improving, but it has a long way to go.

And it would be best if the rhetoric of race was quieted so that the flow was in the right direction.

But he used the word -- Pat always had a flair that could get him in trouble.

And this time it really got him in trouble.

He used the word... -The time may have come when the issue of race could use a period of benign neglect.

-...which came out of some parliamentary document having to do with Canada.

Where Pat got it, I don't know.

But it was there, and Pat got it.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] -A group of civil rights leaders charge that Daniel Patrick Moynihan's suggested policy of "benign neglect" toward Negroes was symptomatic of Nixon administration efforts to wipe out two decades of civil rights gains.

-Had I made any suggestion of that kind, I would imagine I'd react about the way this group reacted.

But I didn't make any suggestion of the kind whatever.

-Concerned by increasing racial tensions in the country, Moynihan had written his memo in part to criticize the incendiary language of Black radicals that he believed was deepening the problem.

-...and you run into one of the cops, be he white honky or be he Black honky.

Brother, they are out to kill you.

America is practicing genocide against Black people.

-But he was equally frustrated with the Nixon administration's stoking of racial animosity, its use of the so-called "Southern strategy" to appeal to whites who had fled the Democratic Party in the wake of Johnson's civil rights legislation.

[ Music continues ] -It was Pat really pushing against the malign attention that Blacks were getting from Nixon and Spiro Agnew and all the other Republicans who were developing and fomenting the Southern strategy, which was, at bottom, a racist strategy.

-Now, I threw down the gauntlet to you.

I repudiate white racists.

Do you repudiate Black racists?

Are you willing to repudiate the Carmichaels and the Browns -- -We have already done so.

-Answer me.

Answer me.

Do you repudiate Rap Brown and Stokely Carmichael?

-We -- -Do you?!

-We don't repudiate them as human beings.

-We repudiate -- -That's what I was afraid of.

-Wait just a minute.

I don't repudiate you.

-Pat's enemies, if such there were, used that memo to discredit him and his liberal initiatives, most importantly, the Family Assistance Plan.

Its passage was going to depend on the Northern liberal votes in the Senate and the House, and the leaking of the memo undermined Pat among liberal elements of the Democratic delegation.

It hurt a lot.

-Howard K. Smith knows what I was saying.

Dave Brinkley knows what I was saying.

You know what I was saying.

Right?

-As you've been described as a leading -- -Look me in the eye, Ed Morgan.

You know what I was saying.

-Yes.

My answer is yes.

-I am told by reliable sources that the net result will be politically damaging.

Moynihan, known as the administration's champion of equal opportunities, now expects to become the target of bitter protest by Negro groups.

Bill Gill, ABC News, the White House.

[ Music continues ] -I don't find that memo to be problematic.

I think what he wanted was a cooling down of the rhetoric.

I think it became interpreted as "Do nothing for Black people."

I don't think, you know, that was what he was necessarily advocating for from a policy perspective.

I think much worse is some of the other memos... where he asserts that the Black middle class is in fact using the Black poor to extort things from White America.

That is incredibly dan-- He's playing with fire right there.

You are running right down the middle of mainstream racism.

That's hard to reconcile except to look at his anger, except to look at his rage.

-The Nixon presidency -- It's hard for people who didn't live through it.

It was such an emotionally charged, divisive period of history.

[ Crowd shouting ] -Civil unrest and angry protests over the continuing war in Vietnam plagued Nixon's presidency.

And Moynihan, while a critic of the war, was deeply disturbed by the growing chaos and violence.

-Pat was spending most of the time in Washington, and Liz and the children were on Francis Street in Cambridge.

-On the Harvard campus, one day after students took over and occupied an administration building, the police were called in, swinging clubs, hauling students out of the building... -A group of radicals at Harvard were calling for Pat's house to be trashed on the grounds that he was a racist as witnessed the Moynihan Report.

-After the police raid, SDS members and sympathizers... -The Secret Service had to get involved to protect their house.

So it was a scary time, and he was furious about this.

[ Crowd cheering ] -It seemed to Moynihan that these were the children of the elite and the privileged and there was disrespect for the institution but also for -- the phrase then used -- Middle America.

Hatred of the police, hatred of the military, of people who actually went and fought the wars.

Moynihan was very distressed by that.

-I remember once walking with him through Harvard Yard, and he said, "We are in this place, but not of it."

-He had a rather literal, almost kind of adolescent, way.

There was a sense of honor.

I can remember the Navy monument -- It's just next to their apartment in Washington.

And he used, literally, to stand on a balcony going at attention, saluting when they played the Navy hymn, for example.

-I am a fella whose first political memory was the 1936 election in New York City, the politics of Franklin Roosevelt, and the war against Germany.

It was a time of intense and legitimate pride in your country and love of your country and so forth, and you can't change me.

-To the radical left, people like Moynihan were about preserving and extending the status quo, keeping the lid on things rather than really making this a better country to live in.

-And at one point, the old traditional socialists suddenly started attacking us.

In a celebrated article, it was decreed that people like Glazer and Moynihan and so forth were not liberals.

We were neoconservatives.

-Pat despised the term "neoconservative."

He thought it was a slur.

Don't ever use that term to describe him when you're talking to Liz Moynihan.

He was considered a neocon.

He wasn't.

He was a New Deal Democrat all the way through his life.

-Moynihan left his role as White House counselor in 1970.

[ Down-tempo march playing ] Two years later, a still-admiring Richard Nixon gave him a surprise appointment as ambassador to India.

The ambassadorship would help set a new course in Moynihan's life -- as diplomat and statesman.

[ "The Star-Spangled Banner" playing ] -Moynihan helped repair relations with New Delhi by negotiating a major debt-relief package for India.

And I think Moynihan got a kick out of the fact that the U.S. gave India the largest check ever written at the time.

And India was a crucible for a lot of ideas that evolved for Pat Moynihan.

He was sick and tired of the sort of ill-thought-out, Marxist-Leninist, anti-West, anti-U.S. intellectual elite in places like India and in other parts of what was then called the Third World.

And he wrote this terrifically powerful essay that the U.S. had to stand up for itself in opposition.

-What Pat said in that article was that official representatives of the United States had been apologizing for the country and had sat silently as the country was defamed and libeled by Third World tyrannies and despotisms.

And he said this was crazy.

[ Applause ] -...do solemnly swear... -...do solemnly swear... -Forty-two floors above Manhattan's Park Avenue, the official residence of the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

The visitor is greeted by the only family servant, Hines, created in paper-maché by the 19-year-old-son of Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] Moynihan is a large leprechaun of a man with the mental equipment of a Harvard professor and with teeth behind his smile.

And he says what he wants how he wants.

In the United Nations today, there are in the range of two dozen democracies left in 142 members.

Totalitarian communist regimes and assorted ancient and modern despotisms make up all the rest.

It is sensed in the world that democracy is in trouble.

There is blood in the water, and the sharks grow frenzied.

[ Music continues ] -It was a time when not only had America lost its confidence in its actions abroad, but there was garbage piled in the New York City streets.

-...garbage collectors refused to work again today... -More than 30,000 tons of garbage line... -It was a time of real and profound loss of confidence.

-"Ford to city: Drop dead."

-If we are to be under attack continuously at the United Nations, as we are, if we are going to be attacked, we are going to defend ourselves and defend ourselves with some enthusiasm.

-Idi Amin, the controversial president of Uganda, has been in the United States for the U.N. General Assembly.

-He took aim at what he called "the bogus state of Israel."

He went on from there.

-Idi Amin was a kind of symbol of the obscenity of a tyrant speaking about international morality.

[ Camera shutters clicking ] And, as they say, that tore it.

-Last week, our ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, used the term "racist murderer" to describe President Idi Amin of Uganda.

Moynihan said it is no accident that Amin is the head of the Organization of African Unity, and that made a lot of Africans angry.

Estimates of the number of Ugandans who've been killed... -It seems to me that the function of public diplomacy and even of private diplomacy is to avoid misunderstanding, to make meaning clear.

-Some of your critics say that perhaps you're too public and that they suspect you of going more for impact than persuasion, more for drama than diplomacy.

-Well, they may be right.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] -I'm here to compliment him and to pay my highest respects for the wonderful job in which he has represented our people in the U.N. By that I mean frustrated Americans that are a lot prouder today because of his presence.

[ Music continues ] -I would walk down the street with Pat.

Taxi drivers would screech to a halt and yell, "You're great!"

You go into a restaurant with him, it happened.

The whole place would stand up and applaud.

We went to a concert once at Carnegie Hall, and the whole audience got up.

I mean, things like that were happening all the time.

It was kind of amazing.

I mean, I've never seen anything quite like it.

-Moynihan had been sharply criticized at the U.N., particularly by British delegate Ivor Richard... -The British ambassador spoke of a "Wyatt Earp approach," with Moynihan's aim occasionally bad.

-...from the pressures of civilized international... -The British ambassador, Ivor Richard, launched an attack on Pat, and Pat was convinced that Kissinger had put him up to it.

[ Indistinct conversations ] -Henry was a European, a great believer that politics between nations is a balance of power, period.

-Come a little closer, Kurt.

Gonna ruin you.

-Now, Kissinger knows that he had to accommodate a strain in America that Pat represented... ...which was that the United States has a messianic gene in its DNA.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created --" Not all Am-- every one.

And the universalism of the Declaration of Independence is part of our national DNA, and a foreign policy that completely excludes that will not hold the American people.

The most hideous thing I've ever had to deal with over at the U.N. was that resolution which called Zionism a form of racism.

-It was Somalia?

-Somalia introduced it.

Um, and -- but Somalia as a Soviet client.

The Russians began that campaign in 1971 -- very open.

When the Russians begin a propaganda campaign, there's a three-part article in Pravda.

And it said Orwellian or horrible was that the Jews, far from being the victims of the Nazis, were the successors to them.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] -Pat understood the importance of words.

Every regime, like liberal democracy, depends not just on force but on principles that people accept as legitimating a regime.

And by labeling Zionism as racism, you were saying that the homeland of the Jewish state was incompatible with liberal democracy.

Whether a statement like that has an effect tomorrow, probably not.

But does it have an effect over the long run, undermining people's allegiances and their willingness to take action, their willingness to prevent bad actions?

Yes.

That's exactly how it happens.

-What we have at stake here is not merely the honor and the legitimacy of the state of Israel, although a challenge to the legitimacy of any member nation ought always to arose the vigilance of all members of the United Nations.

For a yet more important matter is at issue, which is the integrity of that whole body of moral and legal precepts which we know as human rights.

It is sufficient for the moment only to note one foreboding fact -- A great evil has been loosed upon the world.

The abomination of antisemitism has been given the appearance of international sanction.

-People didn't talk like that.

Kissinger didn't talk like that.

He said this is "wicked," "infamous," "evil."

About, you know, a few years later, the president of the United States was calling the Soviet Union "the evil empire."

-...not forsaken them now... -So in that sense, Pat Moynihan was -- it might have embarrassed him to acknowledge -- a precursor of Ronald Reagan.

-The United States of America declares that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act.

Thank you, Mr. President.

[ Applause ] -We need the Pat Moynihans of this world to remind us that our nation's future need not be one of retreat and pessimism.

I'm sorry -- [ Applause ] I'm sorry the administration was unable to keep him.

His voice will be hard to replace.

-Here is Ronald Reagan praising Daniel Moynihan, who may very well run for the Senate this fall from New York.

[ Indistinct conversations ] -I mean, Pat had politics in his blood.

He's been hanging around Democratic clubs since he was about 10.

-Patrick Moynihan's political career began in Hell's Kitchen, where he cast his first vote, at age 21.

-I put on a suit, tie.

I came in, and I walked down there.

Fella I'd never seen in my life said, "Hi, Pat!"

-[ Laughs ] -And I said, uh, "Well, sir, um, I'm not sure I'm eligible to vote."

"Everybody votes!"

he said.

-[ Laughs ] And as I went in the booth, he gave me a little piece of paper showing me who everybody was gonna vote for.

-[ Laughs ] -For all his reputation as a policy wonk, Moynihan loved the business of politics and winning elections.

He had a lifelong respect for the old urban Democratic machines, like Tammany Hall.

Tammany was the epitome of corruption to critics, but to Pat, Tammany was successful because it actually delivered the goods to the poor.

-These were the only political organizations that welcomed new waves of immigrants and gave them the opportunity to get a job and start a family and build respectability.

-One of the things I love is that when Pat was at Harvard, a letter was sent to Carmine De Sapio, who was then in federal prison for bribery and who had been the leader of Tammany Hall.

And Pat said, "Well, I hope you're doing well in prison, and when you get out, why don't you stop by Harvard someday?

I'm sure we would have a lot to learn from you."

So, uh, what a character.

[ Laughs ] That's great.

-♪ Oh, goodbye, my Coney Island baby ♪ The distinguished gentleman singing "Coney Island Baby" is Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of five Democrats running for the Senate.

He's here at a beach club in Brooklyn because these Jewish voters can amount to 35% to 40% of the electorate in a Democratic primary.

Sharing the frontrunning position with him is Congresswoman Bella Abzug.

Mrs. Abzug has maintained her political base among feminists, liberals, and the New Left.

[ Up-tempo music plays ] -It was an extremely close campaign because there were so many candidates, because the margins were so thin.

[ Music continues ] -The campaign, like all campaigns, was short of money.

So what they would do is they would drag Senator Moynihan to Ravitch's office and call people.

-Pat and I used to meet occasionally in the Bemelmans Bar at the Carlyle but more frequently a few blocks to the north in a place called the Madison Pub.

It was a dreadful bar.

Senator Moynihan, who liked the hamburgers at the Madison Pub, would go there and essentially hide because he knew that Ravitch himself found the place to be repulsive.

There was a constant stale smell there, and I'm not sure why Pat liked it.

[ Music continues ] We walked out of the pub one day, and there was a guy on a bike.

And he yelled out at Moynihan, "You right-wing bastard!"

-Daniel Patrick Moynihan is no stranger to slings and arrows.

He caught them as a member of the Johnson and Nixon administrations, and now, as a candidate for the Senate from New York, he still is a target.

Yesterday, campaigning on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, he caught a banana cream pie in the face as the pie thrower, a proclaimed member of the Yippies, the Youth International group of protesters, shouted that Moynihan was a fascist pig.

-Well, I don't think there was any Black politician that supported Moynihan in the primary.

There was Bayard Rustin who was for Moynihan.

-I've said Mr. Moynihan has to prove to the voters that he has renounced Nixon and Ford and their policies.

[ Indistinct conversations ] -Because Pat was still suspect as a liberal, the conventional wisdom -- and it was probably right in this case -- was that the New York Times editorial would make a difference in the primary.

-People knew that John Oakes, the editor of the editorial page, didn't like Moynihan, and we were terribly afraid that we wouldn't get his endorsement.

-While the editor, John Oakes, was on vacation, the publisher had become convinced that the paper should endorse Pat.

And John Oakes was reduced to writing a letter to the editor from Martha's Vineyard opposing the Times editorial.

It was a great moment in American journalism.

-The United States' recent colorful and controversial ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, has won the right to run as a Democrat for the United States Senate.

-Senator Moynihan only won by 10,000 votes, or what he described at the time as a whopping... -...a whopping 1%!

[ Laughter ] -When I first met Pat, he was running against a friend of mine, Jim Buckley.

I was for Buckley and enchanted by Pat.

-I welcome Professor Moynihan into the race.

-He called you a professor today.

-He did what?!

[ Laughter ] Well, it's begun, has it?

My God, it's going to be a long, difficult time, I can see.

-One of the liveliest of the Senate races is here in New York between incumbent Jim Buckley, running on the Republican and Conservative tickets, and Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

-It is a classic confrontation between a conservative defender of local government control and a liberal advocate of national health insurance and federalization of welfare.

-He is shuttling back and forth from the faculty rooms at the Ivy League colleges and taking any job that any president has to offer him.

Well, I believe we ought to send him back to Harvard, send him back to the classrooms, where the kinds of programs he advocates and where his academic attitudes can't do harm.

-Jim Buckley?

-Yep.

-He's an engaging and... and...honest man who hasn't the foggiest notion what the 20th century is all about.

When New York has been Democratic, America has been great, and New York is Democratic again.

-Of course, Moynihan doesn't expect smooth sailing as he carries the case for New York into the Senate.

And when reminded of his somewhat abrasive style in the U.N., Moynihan commented, "Well, at least it got their attention."

Bettina Gregory, ABC News, New York.

[ Indistinct conversations ] [ Glass clinking ] -Now, some of you may have been in the innermost inner sanctum in the Russell Senate Office Building, which was the senator's private toilet in his office.

[ Laughter ] Not many people were allowed through there, and I just, one day, because he was gone and I was goofing around, I went in there.

Now, on the wall, framed, there were two side-by-side magazine covers.

One was The New Republic.

"Moynihan, hope of the neoliberals."

And the other was "Moynihan: savior for the neoconservatives."

[ Laughter ] -When he came into the Senate, there was a lot of skepticism about whether Pat Moynihan was a Democrat.

I mean, he was obviously a Democrat, but was he a Democrat?

Put another way, I think there is at least a half a dozen famous liberal Democrats who wouldn't have been surprised had he run for the Senate as a Republican.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] -He was different from any other senator because he arrived every morning and immediately went into his office and began typing.

He was constantly writing an essay about something.

And it could be about anything.

It could be about architecture.

It could be about Social Security.

It could be his famous essay "Defining Deviancy Down."

-I once said rather mischievously that he while he was in the Senate, he wrote more books than many of his colleagues read.

He leavened the place with a sense of complexity.

-He knew the history of the United States Senate, and he thought that's where, in American politics, you started to change ideas.

-He wanted to spend plenty of time using his bully pulpit to raise big questions.

-He wasn't everyone's cup of tea.

There was a feeling among some of Pat's colleagues that he was a gadfly.

One of Ted Kennedy's top aides told me when I was working on the book, "You know, Pat Moynihan, I always thought he was more trouble than he was worth."

-In his first term, Moynihan, the fierce opponent of the Soviet Union at the U.N., called for a re-examination of the Cold War and the newly escalating nuclear arms race.

-Where I think it was decreed that I was no longer a neoconservative took place about the time I came to the Senate.

And it was on a pretty crucial issue, which was the issue of the Soviet Union.

-Moynihan based his changing opinion on a set of recently emerging data.

-The death rate is one statistic that was hard for the communists to lie about.

Moynihan, as a connoisseur of statistics, knew this.

He followed the work of Murray Feshbach, the analyst who was documenting the increased death rate and the lower life expectancy in the Soviet Union, and he said, "Something pretty terrible is happening."

-Pat believed that conservatives stressing arms weren't wrong but they were missing the point.

The point was -- and this is an essay Pat wrote -- the problem was how to deal with an ailing bear.

-I can tell you I got a call one day from Scoop Jackson himself.

And he said, "Listen.

Can't you do something about your friend?

He's acting like a flake!"

-Our problem between here and the year 2000, is how to deal with the breakup of the Soviet empire.

It's going to break up, Ben.

It's -- It's collapsing.

They can't feed themselves.

That system is going to come apart.

-This is NBC Nightly News.

-Tonight, the end of an era.

Mikhail Gorbachev's farewell as the hammer and sickle is lowered over the Kremlin for the last time.

-With the Soviet Union's demise, Moynihan drew on his earlier work to predict the new and vastly different world fracturing along ethnic lines.

-What he saw with the book "Pandaemonium" was the Cold War is over, and the power balance between the West and the Soviet Union had disappeared.

[ Crowd cheering ] What you were gonna get as a consequence is people tend to organize themselves not as a part of the West or the East, but more oriented toward either a tribe or an ethnic group or a nation-state.

-The great source of violence in our age is conflict over religion, nationalism, language.

Wars that seem more to be associated with the Middle Ages than with the industrial period are upon us again.

[ Mid-tempo music plays ] -Senator Moynihan was viewed in the Senate with enormous respect, sometimes incomprehension, and sometimes a little fear.

And the fear, of course, came from not wanting to go up against him in debate because he'd find something that you hadn't thought of and you'd be in trouble.

-He was philosophically, obviously, very progressive.

You know, he was from up there in New York, and sometime his intellect was further, you know, expanded by a little sip of scotch, perhaps.

But I really admired Pat Moynihan, with his brilliant intellect and his somewhat sharp tongue.

He was interested in the art of the possible.

-He was not an ideologue.

He was an ideas person but not an ideologue.

So he had great friends on the Republican side.

-I remember one of the things he came to talk to me about more than once on the floor of the Senate was the idea of having more transparency with the government and that more of the records of the government should be declassified.

And I never quite figured out why I agreed with him as much as I did.

-Secrecy is a form of power which can be used inside government.

-Moynihan viewed secrecy as almost a cancer in the U.S. government because it had become so absurd how we classify so much.

-Senator Moynihan believed there are things worthy of secrecy.

But he would argue that the more secrecy you have around anything, ultimately the less you will end up knowing about it.

-It's a romantic delusion that there's a secret.

There are none.

Save when things are kept secret, they tend to be wrong.

Keep that up and you will miss huge events and occupy yourself with marginal and unimportant events.

-You know, in many ways, the 9/11 Commission report is an outgrowth of what Moynihan was saying about this -- the CIA, with these massive silos of secrets that they couldn't distinguish the value of.

The FBI had massive silos, and they couldn't distinguish what has value, what doesn't.

-One of my colleagues on the Republican side said, "You know, you couldn't have a Senate of 100 Moynihans, but you sure need a Senate with one or two."

[ Indistinct conversations ] -I'll just share one little vignette that I think is very characteristic of Senator Moynihan.

There was a bankruptcy bill on the floor.

I can't remember what year it was.

It was written by the credit-card industry to make it harder for people to discharge debts.

So Senator Moynihan offered an amendment that said for people with below median income, the status quo would prevail.

Senator Grassley from Iowa went down to the floor and attacked Senator Moynihan's amendment.

-This amendment says that people can purchase over $1,000 in luxury goods, like Gucci loafers and get over $1,000 in cash advances just minutes before declaring bankruptcy.

-He kept referring to "those people."

And he said, "Those people go out and buy Gucci loafers knowing that they're not gonna pay for them."

And Senator Moynihan jumped up, and he said, "Parliamentary inquiry."

-...delay the amendment on the -- -Senator will state his parliamentary inquiry.

-Mr. President, would it be in order for me to offer a second-degree amendment which excluded from the provisions of this amendment any purchase of Gucci loafers?

[ Laughter ] -And you can hear on the tape the Senate parliamentarian whispering to Senator Hutchinson.

-It would be in order.

-I so move, sir.

-Would the senator send the amendment to the desk?

-And at that point, Senator Moynihan just sort of waved him off in disgust... -Mr. President, I've made my point.

I withdraw my request.

-...and then launched into one of the most eloquent, extemporaneous, and poignant speeches about not picking on poor people.

[ Down-tempo music plays ] -Some 30 years after what he saw as a crisis in the impoverished Black family, the number of single parents in America had only expanded.

-An earthquake rumbled through the American family in the last 30 years.

It began in some portions of our society, but it ended affecting all of them.

-Despite years of failed or stalled efforts, Moynihan remained firmly convinced that it was still the government's role to lift these poor families from poverty.

But government, Republicans claimed, had in fact been the prime cause of poverty and the exploding number of single-parent families.

[ Crowd cheering ] In 1994, Republicans swept into both houses of Congress, promising to overturn decades of liberal social policy.

-Let's talk about what the welfare state has created.

Let's talk about the moral decay.

What's gone wrong is a welfare system which subsidized people for doing nothing.

-Through 11 presidents and 31 Congresses, we have sought to aid children in poverty.

We have not always succeeded.

But never, until now, have we undertaken to do harm.

I think a lot of what he did in the earlier years, with the Family Assistance Plan, for example, was really playing offense.

But what happened now was he was really playing defense.

-The history of AFDC showed that there were plenty of people willing to accept welfare and not work very much if at all.

And so that's what we wanted to change, and the only way to change it -- You needed something forceful.

-The bill ends the federal guarantee of cash assistance to the poor and largely turns welfare over to the states while cutting the growth of federal welfare spending $55 billion over six years.

-Moynihan thought if the economy failed to cooperate, we were going to essentially pull the safety net out from under the feet of poor women and children and make them destitute, and there was nowhere for them to go.

-Good evening.

Welfare as we know it is now history.

President Clinton today signed the legislation that ends a government commitment made 61 years ago of federal aid to the nation's poorest.

"An historic opportunity for improvement..." -If in ten years' time, you find children sleeping on grates, picked up in the morning frozen, will anybody remember that there was a time when the federal government said it had a responsibility... for these matters?

-I was heavily influenced by my friend Pat Moynihan, who said that this would have worse consequences than, in fact, it had.

He was wrong, and I was derivatively wrong.

-The White House announced today that federal efforts to reform welfare have worked even better than expected.

-Fourteen million Americans were on welfare in 1993.

That number has been reduced by more than half... -It did send many into the workforce.

It did reduce welfare caseloads.

It turned out that when the lifetime entitlement to welfare was repealed, people adapted.

They were more adaptable than Pat thought.

-...NBC's Gwen Ifill reports, not all of the predictions of disaster have come true.

-If you look at the decline in the rolls, the decline should start in 1997, right, when welfare reform is implemented across the states.

But it doesn't.

It starts in 1994.

-That was when a 20-year-old poverty program called the earned-income tax credit was dramatically expanded by President Clinton.

The program, targeted to poor working families, had been modeled on Moynihan's more expansive Family Assistance Plan.

[ Down-tempo music plays ] -The greatest legacy of Pat Moynihan -- or one of the greatest -- is that the program that he pioneered in the '70s, in the early '70s, is pretty much now there.

-The basic idea was in the Family Assistance Plan, even if your wages are too low to support your children, we have made work manageable by providing an EITC.

-You can actually afford to go to work.

We changed the rules, and people behaved like rational actors.

And the EITC became this major engine that lifts people out of poverty.

[ Music continues ] -The fundamental thing is you will never solve the problem of poverty through the wage and employment system alone.

A great many people work full time, try to maintain their families, maintain an independent situation in life, and just don't do it 'cause they don't make enough money.

And therefore, you must supplement their wages.

For those who have managed to find full-time, full-year work, things have probably never been better, at least in modern history.

-But what do you do with people who can't work?

We are seeing the deep poor, for whom there is no longer a safety net.

-I have to admit that the problem that he was the most concerned about, namely that at the bottom there still is a large and apparently growing group of moms who are in deep poverty and, really -- as ridiculous as it is to say this -- nobody is doing much about it.

Boy, if Moynihan were alive, he'd have 50 hearings next Tuesday morning on what are we gonna do to help these moms.

-When people talk to me about you, I always refer them to The Almanac of American Politics, which says, "He's the nation's best thinker among politicians since Lincoln and the best politician among thinkers since Jefferson."

How's that sound?

-That sounds overstated.

-[ Laughs ] -But it's a fine note on which to say it's time to go.

-Moynihan retired in 2001 and was succeeded by Hillary Clinton, who announced his death today.

-A small funeral procession carried the senator to his final resting place, Arlington National Cemetery, overlooking the city he loved.

[ Down-tempo music plays ] -You know, the Moynihan Report was the last point where you had a federal official making an argument -- an implicit argument -- for a massive investment in African-American communities, massive benevolent investment and tying that case for investment to history.

That is something that just really wouldn't happen today.

[ Music continues ] -Pat always had a gray document case on the floor.

As he'd read papers, reports, things, he'd drop notes to himself into that box.

And when he died and I went through the last box that he'd been collecting -- because that's what he's going to be working on -- it was all about poverty, family poverty.

[ Music continues ] -It is the finest work an American can have.

And it's not easy.

As President Kennedy would say, "Democracy is a difficult kind of government.

It demands all sorts of qualities of steadfastness, purpose, and integrity."

And then he said, "And it also requires knowledge."

I wish that was a little more clear -- that there has to be an elemental knowledge of how our system works, what is involved, and you never are -- You're always behind that curve.

But if you just don't let it get lost altogether, you can do well enough, and that, I think, is about what, at the end of a fairly honorable day, most of us would be content to have judged about us.

-I'm not sure you can show anybody how to tie a bow tie.

But you can tell them.

You start at the beginning.

Guess what you want to do first is you want to -- Got to button that top button.

Then you got to sort of locate your bow tie, and you put it on like that.

Then you put down your collar.

Right?

Don't think when you tie a bow tie.

Just do it the way your mother taught you to tie your shoelaces when you were 14 months old.

Mind, if you've never seen shoelaces, you probably will never tie a bow tie.

© 2024 WNET. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.